Clinical Relevance of Inter-Method Differences in Fat-Free Mass Estimation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Liam P. Kilduff,Jonathan P. Fuld,J. Alberto Neder,Yannis P. Pitsiladis,Roger Carter,Robin Stevenson,Susan A. Ward
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000075203
2003-01-01
Respiration
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Evaluation of fat-free mass (FFM) is becoming recognised as an important component in the assessment of clinical status and formulation of prognosis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether potential differences in FFM estimation performed by air displacement plethysmography (ADP), bioelectrical impedance (BIE) and anthropometry (ANTHRO) would assume clinical significance.METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with moderate-to-severe COPD were submitted to FFM estimation by ADP, BIE and ANTHRO. FFM was then allometrically related to peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2) as determined by symptom-limited incremental cycle ergometry.RESULTS: We found that ANTHRO classified fewer patients as 'FFM-depleted' than the other two techniques (p < 0.05). Although mean biases of the BIE-ADP differences were close to zero, their 95% confidence limits extended as high as 5.9 kg (16%). The ANTHRO-based allometric exponents for peak VO2 correction of FFM, therefore, were typically higher than those obtained by the other two methods in both depleted and non-depleted patients (ANTHRO: 1.45-1.41, BIE: 0.97-1.18, ADP: 1.08-1.14, respectively).CONCLUSION: We conclude that between-method differences in FFM estimation can be sufficiently large to have practical implications in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. A single method of body composition assessment, therefore, should be used for FFM estimation in these patients.
respiratory system
What problem does this paper attempt to address?