Abstract:Dear editor, We have read with great interest the article entitled “Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of distal tibial fracture using a posterolateral approach: a cadaveric study and preliminary report” by Kritsaneephaiboon et al. [1]. They described a posterolateral approach combined with the MIPO technique to treat distal tibial fracture in one patient and the anatomical relationships between the posterior tibial artery, tibial nerve, sural nerve, lesser saphenous vein and the plate in a cadaveric study. They concluded that this protocol could be a reasonable and safe treatment option for distal tibial fractures (including the plion fractures) with anterior soft-tissue problem. However, there are some concerns regarding this study. First, the case reported by the authors did not involve the articular surface of the distal tibia. They also stated that their technique could be used in pilon fractures. However, in our opinion, MIPO would cause great difficulty with the articular reduction for pilon fractures. As is known, most pilon fractures are characterised by the severe comminution of the articular surface, especially the type C3 fractures. As to the treatment for this type of fracture, both soft-tissue protection and anatomical reduction of the articular surface should be considered. For MIPO techniques, the limited incision is usually not large enough to allow visualisation of the joint surface and direct manipulation of fracture fragments, especially the die-punch fragments. Borens et al. [2] retrospectively evaluated 17 patients with type C pilon fractures, who were treated with MIPO techniques. Articular reduction was maintained in only four patients and seven patients developed moderate arthritis. Second, an L-shaped contralateral anterolateral distal tibial locking plate was placed through a distal 2.5-cm posterolateral incision to stabilise the fracture. In our opinion, for most pilon fractures, the distal incision is too small to expose the articular surface, drill and place the screws, especially the medial screw for fixation of the medial fragments. Perhaps, the posterolateral incision should be enlarged or an additional small posteromedial incision should be used. Third, the case reported by the authors had no fibular fracture. However, most distal tibial fractures are associated with fibular fractures. We would like to know how to deal with the fibular fracture when the MIPO techniques through the posterolateral approach are used to stabilise the tibial fracture. If a traditional posterolateral approach was used, both the tibial and fibular fractures could be simultaneously treated through the same incision [3]. Finally, we think their techniques might be more suitable for single distal tibial fractures with no involvement of the fibula and distal tibial articular surface rather than the classic pilon fractures.

Comparison of three plate system for lateral malleolar fixation

Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis for distal metaphyseal fracture of tibia:Meta plate versus locking plate

Comment on Kritsaneephaiboon Et Al.: Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis of Distal Tibial Fracture Using a Posterolateral Approach: a Cadaveric Study and Preliminary Report

Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis with locking TCP versus dynamic condylar screw in the internal fixation of comminuted fracture of the distal femur

Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis Combined with Locking Compression Plate for the Treatment of Distal Tibial Fractures

Finite element analysis and a pilot study of different fixation constructs for Danis-Weber A and B lateral malleolus fractures

Comprehensive biomechanical analysis of three clinically used fixation constructs for posterior malleolar fractures using cadaveric and finite element analysis

Biomechanical Comparison of Locking Plate and Cancellous Screw Techniques in Medial Malleolar Fractures: A Finite Element Analysis.

Polyaxial locking plating for fractures of the distal tibia with very short metaphyseal fragments: Retrospective analysis of 32 cases from one institution in 1 year

Comparison efficacy of interlocking intramedullary nail and invasive percutaneous locking ;compression plate osteosynthesis for treatment of distal tibia fractures

Curative Effect of Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis for Complex Fractures of the Distal Femur

Clinical effectiveness of MIPPO combined with locking compression plate in treatment of middle and lower tibiofibula fracture

Comparison of Low, Multidirectional Locked Nailing and Plating in the Treatment of Distal Tibial Metadiaphyseal Fractures

Application effect of 1/3 tubular plate on operative treatment of posterior malleolar fractures of the ankle

Comparison of tibial fracture plate length, placement, and fibular integrity effects on plate integrity through finite element analysis

Comparison Of Modern Locked Plating And Antiglide Plating For Fixation Of Osteoporotic Distal Fibular Fractures

Comparison of therapeutic effects of anatomic plate and Liss plate implantation for treating complex fractures of tibial plateau

Biomechanical comparison of two internal fixation methods for AO type A3 fractures of distal femur

Locking Internal Fixator with Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis for the Proximal and Distal Tibial Fractures.

Medial versus lateral locking plate for fixation of distal tibial fractures

Clinical Observation About Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis with external Fixator for Distal Tibia Fractures