Comparison of Low, Multidirectional Locked Nailing and Plating in the Treatment of Distal Tibial Metadiaphyseal Fractures

Yong Li,Lei Liu,Xin Tang,Fuxing Pei,Guanglin Wang,Yue Fang,Hui Zhang,Nicolas Crook

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1494-9

IF: 3.479

2012-01-01

International Orthopaedics

Abstract:Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the results of a new technique for low, multidirectional locked nailing with closed reduction and minimally invasive plating in the treatment of distal tibial metadiaphyseal fractures. Methods Forty-six matched patients were divided according to age, gender, Injury Severity Score, and fracture pattern into group A (expert tibial nailing) and group B (minimally invasive plating). Then, the patients were followed up, and the clinical and radiographic results were retrospectively analysed. Results The mean followed-up was 24.7 ± 2.7 months in group A and 25.8 ± 2.8 months in group B. No patient had nonunion, shortening, hardware breakdown, or deep-seated infection. Patients in group A had a significantly shorter mean operating time, hospital stay, full weight-bearing time and union time (76 ± 16.6 vs. 90 ± 20.3 minutes, p = 0.000; 5.8 ± 2.1 vs. 8.9 ± 3.1 days, p = 0.000; 9.0 ± 1.4 vs. 11.1 ± 1.7 weeks, p = 0.000; and 21.3 ± 3.5 vs. 23.1 ± 3.6 weeks, p = 0.047, respectively). Three patients in group A and one patient in group B presented with malalignment ( p = 0.608). The mean Olerud-Molander Ankle score was 89.0 ± 7.1 in group A and 87.6 ± 8.4 in group B ( p = 0.478). Conclusions Distal tibia metadiaphyseal fractures may be treated successfully with low, multidirectional locked nails or plates. However, low, multidirectional locked nailing may represent a superior surgical option, since it offers advantages in terms of mean operating time, hospital stay, full weight-bearing time and union time.