Comparsion of the therapeutic effects of less invasive locking plate and interlocking intramedullary nail for tibial and fibula shaft fractures

CAO Cheng,HUANG Yongfeng,ZHU Fahao,YANG Huilin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-7210.2012.15.017
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate and discuss the clinical outcomes and complications of two kinds of internal fixation in the treatment of the tibial and fibula shaft fractures.Methods A retrospective study was carried out in 102 patients from June 2008 to June 2011 which was suffer the tibia and fibula shaft fractures.According to different surgery ways,the patients were divided into 50 cases of less invasive locking plate group and 52 cases of interlocking intramedullary nail group.Operation time and intra-operative blood loss,postoperative complications,time of leaving bed,time of bone union,and the HSS score of the knee were recorded.Results All the 102 patients were followed for 13-18 months.The time of operation and intra-operative blood loss in less invasive locking plate group were lower than those in interlocking intramedullary nail group(P < 0.05).2 patients got infection,1 patient was delayed union,1 patient was malunion,no nonunion in less invasive locking plate group;1 patient was infection,1 patient was delayed union,1 patient was nonunion,no nonunion in interlocking intramedullary nail group.Conclusion There were no statistical differences in postoperative complications,the time of bone union,and the HSS score of the knee in the two group,which shows that less invasive locking plate versus interlocking intramedullary nail has the advantage of more minimal and less time of operation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?