Abstract:Background: Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS FNA) is the first-line modality to diagnose suspected solid pancreatic malignant lesions. Elastography-guided FNA has been shown to improve the diagnostic yield of EUS FNA but prospective studies are limited. The aim of the study was to compare diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of conventional and elastography-guided EUS FNA in patients with suspected malignant pancreatic solid masses. Methods: Patients with suspected malignant solid pancreatic lesions presenting to our institute from July 2021 to January 2023 were recruited and randomized to conventional and elastography-guided EUS FNA using a 22-G EUS FNA needle. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. Results: Total 48 patients were initially screened for inclusion in the study, of which six were excluded and 42 patients underwent randomization. Finally, 20 patients in each group underwent the assigned intervention and were analyzed further. Baseline patient characteristics were similar in conventional FNA and elastography-guided FNA group with median age 52 (range 29-74) years and 51.8 (range 31-72) years, respectively, males being 70% and 75%, respectively. Median size of the lesion was 34 mm (range 14-48 mm) and 37 (range 18 to 50 mm), respectively, for both conventional and elastography arm. The average size of the lesion was 35.7 mm. Overall, the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma was made in 65% of cases. In the remaining cases, diagnoses were inflammatory mass, Castleman's disease, solid pseudopapillary epithelial neoplasm (SPEN), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), pancreatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) and metastasis. Conventional EUS FNA had diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of 90%, 87.5%, 100%, 100% and 62.92%, respectively, and elastography-guided EUS FNA had diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of 85%, 100%, 100% and 54.59%, respectively. No severe adverse events were noted. Conclusion: There is no significant difference between conventional and elastography-guided EUS FNA in terms of diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values. Both techniques appear safe and effective for characterizing solid pancreatic masses and elastography did not score numerically over the conventional arm.

Impact of Inconclusive Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Results in the Management and Outcome of Patients with Solid Pancreatic Masses

EUS-FNA Biopsy for Pancreatic Mass

Percutaneous ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions: An analysis of 1074 lesions

Utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in pancreatic cancer patients who failed to obtain a pathological diagnosis in surgical exploration

Diagnostic Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration: A Single-Center Analysis

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) elastography-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) versus conventional EUS FNAC for solid pancreatic lesions: A pilot randomized trial

Comparison of EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB for diagnosis of solid pancreatic mass lesions: a meta-analysis of prospective studies

Potential Factors of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) Associated with Percentage of Classifying Pathologic Diagnosis for Pancreatic Diseases

Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with percutaneous ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions

Methods to increase the diagnostic efficiency of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesions: An updated review

Analysis of Fine-Needle Biopsy Vs Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Pancreatic and Abdominal Masses: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration for Gastrointestinal Lesions with Inconclusive Endoscopic Biopsies

A Prospective Multicenter Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing FNA and FNB in the Diagnosis of Solid Masses

Impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration on positive peritoneal lavage cytology in patients with resectable pancreatic body and tail cancer

Direct Comparison of Elastography Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration and B-Mode Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosing Solid Pancreatic Lesions

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy alone vs. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid onsite evaluation in pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial

Endoscopic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Fine-Needle Aspiration or Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Solid Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Factors Affecting the Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasound‐guided Fine Needle Aspiration for the Diagnosis of Small (≤20 Mm) Pancreatic Lesions

The clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration on the patients with low-risk pancreatic cystic lesions

A Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration and Fine-Needle Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions

Endoscopic Ultrasonography Guided Transgastric Trans-Portal System Fine Needle Aspiration for Diagnosing Pancreatic Head and Uncinate Process Malignancy.