Utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in pancreatic cancer patients who failed to obtain a pathological diagnosis in surgical exploration

Meng-Jiang He,Tian-Yin Chen,Xin-Yang Liu,Xiao-Yue Xu,Ping-Hong Zhou,Yi-Qun Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-21-913

2022-01-01

Gland Surgery

Abstract:Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) allows for the analysis of diagnostic tissue specimens from various regions. For pancreatic tumors, especially un-resectable ones, how to obtain pathological confirmation is important for determining sub-sequent treatment. The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical utility of EUS-FNA in patients who failed to obtain a pathological diagnosis in surgical exploration. Methods: Patients who underwent EUS-FNA due to unsuccessful biopsy in surgical exploration in our center were retrospectively reviewed. All of the patients were diagnosed with resectable disease before surgery but were found to be unresectable during surgery. The positive rate of pathological diagnosis of EUS-FNA was analyzed. Results: A total of 11 patients were included in this study, among which 8 were males and 3 were females. The median age of the patients was 55 years (range, 48 to 73 years). The median lesion size was 34 mm (range, 25 to 44 mm). The median number of needle passes was 3 (range, 1 to 3). Two patients underwent biliary stent implantation while 3 patients underwent gastrojejunostomy before EUS-FNA. The technical success rate of EUS-FNA was 100% (11/11); 10 (90.9%, 10/11) samples were positive and 1 was negative (being inadequate). Conclusions: Intraoperative biopsy is the first choice diagnostic modality for unresectable pancreatic neoplasms. However, for patients who fail to obtain a pathological diagnosis in surgical exploration, EUSFNA is still worth an attempt.