Impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration on positive peritoneal lavage cytology in patients with resectable pancreatic body and tail cancer

Yasutaka Ishii,Masahiro Serikawa,Kenichiro Uemura,Yumiko Tatsukawa,Shinya Nakamura,Juri Ikemoto,Sayaka Miyamoto,Koji Arihiro,Shinya Takahashi,Shiro Oka
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.12064
2024-08-08
Abstract:Background/purpose: A recent study has demonstrated that the timing of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) significantly influences the peritoneal lavage cytology (CY) outcomes in pancreatic body-tail cancer. The aim of this study was to clarify the impact of EUS-FNA on CY positivity in patients with resectable pancreatic body-tail cancer. Methods: Patients with anatomically resectable pancreatic body-tail cancer surgically resected at Hiroshima University Hospital were enrolled, and elated clinicopathological factors, including EUS-FNA variables and CY positivity rate, were analyzed. Results: Of the 129 eligible patients, 16 (12%) had positive CY. The EUS-FNA rates of the CY-positive and CY-negative groups were not significantly different (63% vs. 52%, p = .440). Multivariate analysis revealed that lymph node metastasis was the only independent risk factor for CY positivity (odds ratio: 5.734, p = .031). A total of 10 (14%) of the 69 patients who underwent EUS-FNA had positive CY; however, needle specifications and the interval between EUS-FNA and CY examination did not differ between the CY-positive and CY-negative groups. CY positivity rates were comparable for intervals ≤14 days and ≥15 days (17% vs. 14%, p = 1.000). Conclusions: EUS-FNA may not affect CY positivity in patients with resectable pancreatic body-tail cancer, regardless of the timing.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?