Abstract:After more than a century of existence, theoretical development, research, and clinical practice within the psychoanalytic movement have consistently demonstrated that psychoanalysis is not a unitary and autonomous discipline. This has been evidenced by the various ways in which psychoanalytic thought and practice have been informed by and have established a dialogue-more or less fruitful-with related disciplines (neurosciences, developmental psychology, psychotherapy research, attachment theory and research, feminism, philosophy). This dialogue has contributed to a better understanding of the functioning of the human psyche, and therefore of the analytic process, informing clinical interventions. In turn, it has enriched research on psychoanalytic practice and process, underlining the fact that research in psychoanalysis is fundamentally about clinical practice. Since its origins, psychoanalysis has made explicit the work on the patient-analyst relationship as the terrain in which the analytic process unfolds. For its part, research in psychotherapy has demonstrated the relevance of the therapeutic relationship for the good development and outcome of any psychotherapeutic process. This supports the argument that research in clinical psychoanalysis should be research on the impact of the analyst interventions on the analyst-patient relationship. In this context, a central element of what happens in the analytic relationship refers to affect communication and therefore, affect regulation, which is manifested in the transferential and counter-transferential processes, as well as in the therapeutic bond. On the other hand, affective regulation is found at the crossroads of etiopathogenesis, complex personality models and psychopathology, allowing the understanding of human functioning and the staging of these configurations in the patient-analyst relationship. In this way, research on affective regulation in the analytic process is proposed as a path that exemplifies interdisciplinary research and scientific pluralism from which psychoanalysis enriches and progresses as a discipline. The case of a line of research on affective regulation in psychoanalytic psychotherapy is illustrated. The need to resort to other disciplines, as well as the translational value of our research and its clinical usefulness, is discussed.

Clinical Questions And Real Research

Teaching Clinical Research: What Clinicians Need to Know.

Ethical considerations in clinical training, care and research in psychopharmacology

Reconceptualizing Schizophrenia.

Challenges and ways forward in bridging units of analysis in clinical psychological science.

Intensive Clinical and Subjective Studies

Clinical Research Methods for Treatment, Diagnosis, Prognosis, Etiology, Screening, and Prevention: A Narrative Review.

Clinical Animal Behaviour: Paradigms, Problems and Practice

A Phenomenological Paradigm for Empirical Research in Psychiatry and Psychology: Open Questions

Subjective experiences of schizophrenia: toward a new dynamic psychiatry--II.

IN COGNITIVE-PSYCHOLOGICAL TERMS

A Case for Translation From the Clinic to the Laboratory

Clinical Evidence, Triangulation of Perspectives and Contextualization. Part 1: The Beginning of Carla's Treatment

Toward a Clinical Consumer Psychology

Intensive Clinical-Studies - the Psychotherapy of Schizophrenia

Reflective practice in clinical psychology: Reflections from basic psychological science.

[Discussion on Solutions to Ethical Issues of Clinical Researches in a Real World].

The Clinical Relevance of Interdisciplinary Research on Affect Regulation in the Analytic Relationship

Clinical and Research Perspectives on the Therapeutic Conversation: The Case of MS. M.

Discussion of solutions to ethical issues in real-world study

Characteristics and challenges of clinical outcome research