Toward Multidisciplinary Tools for Complex Clinical Psychopharmacology Cases: A Qualitative Study with French Healthcare Professionals
Matthieu Lebrat,Rachel Megard,Anne-Cecile Gallo Blandin,Nicolas Franck,Luc Zimmer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.s481398
2024-12-18
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Abstract:Matthieu Lebrat, 1, 2 Rachel Megard, 1 Anne-Cecile Gallo Blandin, 3 Nicolas Franck, 1, 4, 5 Luc Zimmer 2, 5– 7 1 Pôle Centre Rive Gauche, Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier, Lyon, France; 2 Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; 3 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France; 4 UMR 5229 CNRS, Centre Ressource de Réhabilitation psychosociale, Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier, Lyon, France; 5 Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France; 6 Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM, CNRS, Lyon, France; 7 CERMEP, Lyon, France Correspondence: Matthieu Lebrat, Pôle Centre Rive Gauche, Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier, BP 30039 - 95 Bd Pinel 69678 Bron Cedex, Lyon, France, Email Purpose: Psychopharmacology prescriptions are complex, partly due to the complexity of the relationship between diagnosis and its etiology, as well as the iatrogenic impact on symptomatology. Many multidisciplinary tools exist to optimize their management and improve evidence-based practice. However, their multidisciplinary integration seems to be a challenge. This study aimed to collect information on barriers and facilitators perceived by hospital health professionals regarding the use of multidisciplinary tools to address complex situations in psychopharmacology. Research Design and Methods: A mixed-methods research approach using semi-structured interviews was conducted with physicians and pharmacists from 11 hospital institutions. An interview guide developed from the COM-B model (Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation - Behavior) was used to identify barriers and facilitators to the use of multidisciplinary tools. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify emerging themes and mapped to the COM-B model. Results: 28 professionals were interviewed. Identified barriers were: lack of knowledge and time to address complex situations, incomplete medical records, lack of easily accessible multidisciplinary tools, insufficient levels of evidence in psychopharmacology. Identified facilitators were: continuing education, communication and networking among professionals, implementation of adapted and shared resources, deprescribing, awareness of medication-induced iatrogenesis, accessibility of tools for all populations. Conclusion: Identified barriers and facilitators in the use of multidisciplinary tools for complex situations in psychopharmacology helped to model factors that enable behavior change. Answers need to be provided to help professionals ensure and optimize psychopharmacological therapies. Keywords: patient care team, psychopharmacology, hospitals, mental health, capability – opportunity - motivation – behavior (COM-B) model Psychopharmacology is the science that studies psychotropic drugs, medications that modify mental activity, behaviors, and sensations by acting on the central nervous system. Psychotropic drugs are frequently used, as in 2019, it was estimated that one in eight people worldwide had a mental health disorder. 1 In France, like in other countries, these disorders are a public health issue. 2 They represent a leading cause of years lived with a disability and one of the main causes of years of healthy life lost. 3,4 Psychopharmacology can be a challenging discipline, especially when it comes to using the most suitable molecule for the patient's clinical situation. Pharmacological treatments are still symptomatic drugs and do not directly target the underlying causes of mental disabilities, which remain uncertain. Despite the significant evolution of etiological theories of psychiatric diseases, many etiopathogenic areas remain under investigation to further improve therapeutic approaches. 5 In mental health, the weak association between clinical outcomes (diagnosis, as reported in both the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders–5th edition (DSM-5) 6 and the International Classification of Diseases–11th revision (ICD-11) 7 ) and their etiology has caused a lack of confidence in psychiatric diagnoses. 8 Along with these concerns regarding biomedical models, the prescription of psychotropic drugs used to improve symptoms is not without iatrogenic effects. 9,10 Managing the side effects of psychotropic drugs is even more challenging because they can impact the symptoms themselves, which, as we have seen, are at the basis of the diagnosis and therefore the pharmacological treatment. This implies consequences on clinical practice that G. A. Fava and C. Rafanelli have been investigated in a 2019 editorial, synthetizing these iatrogenic components. -Abstract Truncated-
health care sciences & services