Abstract:BACKGROUND: Mandibular retraction is the main etiological mechanism of class II malocclusion in China and the subsequent distal molar relationship can cause functional discomfort in mastication, breathing and the temporomandibular joint. The use of mandibular advancement (MA) devices has recently emerged as an adolescent mandibular retraction treatment; however, current studies regarding the effect thereof are relatively few, and there is lack of sufficient clinical support.AIM: To investigate the clinical effect of invisalign MA on the treatment of mandibular retraction in adolescents.METHODS: This study included 30 adolescent patients who underwent treatment with the MA appliances from December 2017 to June 2021. The lateral cephalometric data before and after treatment were collected and imported into Dolphin Imaging software. The changes were measured by linear measurement superimposed with lateral cephalometric trajectory based on the Pancherz technology.RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the length and position of maxilla before and after the treatment. The position of the mandible moved 3.13 mm, the length increased 4.14 mm, the mandibular ramus length increased 4.09 mm, the body length increased 4.25 mm, and the position of the condyle moved 1.03 mm forward after treatment. Additionally, changes in the incisor sagittal position and labial inclination were observed. The position of the upper incisor point moved back 1.33 mm, without statistical difference, the inclination and tooth angle decreased by 3.44° and 4.06°, respectively; the position of the lower incisor point was moved 2.98 mm, and the inclination and tooth angle increased by 2.62° and 1.23°, respectively. Furthermore, changes in the incisor overjet and molar relationship were seen. Overjet decreased by 4.31 mm, of which 1.78 mm was due to dental factors, accounting for 41.3% of the effect as opposed to 58.7% due to skeletal factors. Molar relationship improved 3.87 mm, with 1.34 mm due to dental factors, and dental and skeletal factors were accounted for 34.6% and 65.4% of the effect, respectively.CONCLUSION: For adolescent patients with mandible retraction, invisalign MA can effectively promote the mandible growth, and it was proven to be mainly due to skeletal effects.

[The Feasibility and Reliability of Pancherz's Analysis in Evaluating the Treatment Effects of Bite-Jumping on Skeletal Class II Malocclusion].

[The dental and skeletal effects of the jumping-the-bite plate and high-pull headgear combination. A clinical study of treated patients]

[Clinical Analysis of Two-Phase Treatment of 35 Cases with Angle Class II Division 1 Malocclusion].

Evaluation with Pancherz's analysis of forsus appliance in the treatment of Angle Ⅱ malocclusion with mandibular retrusion at the peak stage of development

Evaluation of activator treatment with Pancherz class Ⅱ correction analysis for Angle Ⅱmalocclusion

Pancherz Analysis for Space Closure with the Use of MBT Brackets

Treatment Outcome in Angle Class II, Division 1 Patients in Pre-puberty and Puberty after Jumping-the-Bite Appliance

Treatment Outcome in Angle Class II, Division 1 Patients in Pre-puberty and Puberty after Jumpingthe-Bite Appliance

Differential skeletal and dental effects after orthodontic treatment with bite jumping appliance or activator: a retrospective cephalometric study

Stability of Maxillary Protraction Therapy in Children with Class III Malocclusion: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Efficacy of invisible advancement correction for mandibular retraction in adolescents based on Pancherz analysis

[Preliminary Investigation of Lower Second Molar Extraction in Correction of Severe Skeletal Class III Malocclusion].

A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Orthopedic Treatment in Class III Malocclusions: Maxillary Protraction with Skeletal Anchorage or a Rapid Maxillary Expander.

Morphologic predictors of mandibular changes induced by Sander's Bite Jumping Appliance

[Treatment of Angle Class II Division I Malocclusion Cases with Twin-block Appliance Combined with Face Bow and Intermaxillary Elastic: Report of 17 Cases].

[Treatment of Class II malocclusion using Herbst appliance with headgear and rapid palatal expansion and straight wire appliance with implant anchorage]

Treatment Effects of Simple Fixed Appliance and Reverse Headgear in Correction of Anterior Crossbites

The use of tensor analysis to investigate facial changes in treated class II division 1 malocclusions

[Timing of treatment with bite-jumping appliance in orthodontics].

[Efficacy Evaluation of Fixed Twin-block Appliance and Tooth Extraction in Skeletal Class II Malocclusion].

A Comparison of Three Cephalometric Analysis on the Evaluation of Orthodontic Treatment