Pancherz Analysis for Space Closure with the Use of MBT Brackets

谷岩,刘怡,魏松,胡炜,许天民
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-7632.2005.03.008
2005-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the amount of mesial movement of upper first molar and lingual movement of upper incisor between one-step and two-step sliding groups with the use of Pancherz analysis.Methods One-step sliding group consisted of fifteen subjects (5 males and 10 females, average age of 12.4± 1.1 years) with increased overjet. When use of headgear with/without TPA, upper six anterior teeth slid distally to close space after alignment. Two-step sliding group consisted of fifteen subjects (5 males and 10 females, average age of 12.6± 1.1 years) with increased overjet. When use of headgear with/without TPA, upper four anterior teeth slid distally to close space after alignment and retraction of canine into proper position. Cephalgrams were taken at the beginning of the treatment and at the end of the treatment and were analyzed with Pancherz analysis.Results The amount of lingual movement of the tip of the upper incisor was 4.2mm and 4.5mm and the amount of mesial movement of upper first molars was 4.6mm and 4.7mm in one-step sliding group and two-step sliding group, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups. The reduction of the overjet was 3.0mm and 3.6mm in one-step sliding group and two-step sliding group, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups.Conclusion Due to the characteristics of MBT brackets, the preliminary results of the current study suggested that there was no significant difference in the amount of lingual movement of the tip of the upper incisor and mesial movement of upper first molars between the two groups.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?