Reliability Assessment and Correlation Analysis of Evaluating Orthodontic Treatment Outcome in Chinese Patients
Guang-Ying Song,Zhi-He Zhao,Yin Ding,Yu-Xing Bai,Lin Wang,Hong He,Gang Shen,Wei-Ran Li,Sheldon Baumrind,Zhi Geng,Tian-Min Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2013.72
IF: 24.897
2013-01-01
International Journal of Oral Science
Abstract:This study aimed to assess the reliability of experienced Chinese orthodontists in evaluating treatment outcome and to determine the correlations between three diagnostic information sources. Sixty-nine experienced Chinese orthodontic specialists each evaluated the outcome of orthodontic treatment of 108 Chinese patients. Three different information sources: study casts（SC）, lateral cephalometric X-ray images（LX） and facial photographs（PH） were generated at the end of treatment for 108 patients selected randomly from six orthodontic treatment centers throughout China. Six different assessments of treatment outcome were made by each orthodontist using data from the three information sources separately and in combination. Each assessment included both ranking and grading for each patient. The rankings of each of the 69 judges for the 108 patients were correlated with the rankings of each of the other judges yielding 13 873 Spearman rs values, ranging from –0.08 to 10.85. Of these, 90% were greater than 0.4, showing moderate-to-high consistency among the 69 orthodontists. In the combined evaluations, study casts were the most significant predictive component（R250.86, P,0.000 1）, while the inclusion of lateral cephalometric films and facial photographs also contributed to a more comprehensive assessment（R250.96, P,0.000 1）. Grading scores for SC1LX and SC1PH were highly significantly correlated with those for SC1LX1PH（r（SC1LX）vs.（SC1LX1PH） 50.96, r（SC1PH）vs.（SC1LX1PH） 50.97）, showing that either SC1LX or SC1PH is an excellent substitute for all three combined assessment.