Abstract:We read with great interest the article by Onuma et al. [1] which evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy of ABSORB bioasorbable everolimus-eluting stent (BVS) scaffold. The investigators of the study have made pioneering contributions to the assessment of bioresorbable scaffolds. It was concluded that sustained safety could be achieved after the implantation of a fully bioresorbable Absorb everolimus-eluting scalffold with a low event rate at 5 years. Besides, the ABSORB Cohort A trial confirmed the feasibility of noninvasive anatomic and functional assessment of the scaffold with the use of multislice computed tomography (MSCT) angiography and MSCT-based fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment. However, we have several concerns with regard to the study. First, we have to notice that noninvasive FFR analysis was feasible only in 13 patients. The limited size has weakened the reliability of noninvasive FFR performance in assessing functional outcome of ABSORB BVS. Good image quality of all coronary arteries and accurate lumen boundary descriptions are essential for the noninvasive FFR interpretation [2]. Although published reports suggested that CT derived FFR (FFRCT) accuracy was less affected by MSCT image quality than CT stenosis [3], there were four patients (22.2%) who cannot have FFRCT analysis due to severe artifact. Besides, in those with feasible FFRCT, numerous artifacts including calcification, motion, and misregistration may also affect MSCT performance and lead to inaccurate anatomic models for FFRCT computation [4]. Thus, the feasibility and precision of FFRCT need to be further improved. It is not appropriate to use FFRCT alone as a hemodynamic parameter in functional coronary stenosis measurement. Second, a fly in the ointment of the study was the absence of invasive FFR as a reference against noninvasive FFRCT at 5 years. Despite Onuma et al. demonstrated several reasons that they decided to perform repeat MSCT alone instead of invasive imaging, we cannot deny the fact that no published convincing trial exists for FFRCT in the evaluation of interventional treatment [4], although the DISCOVER-FLOW study [5] validated that the FFRCT had a good correlation with an invasive FFR, and the DeFACTO trial [6] demonstrated that the FFRCT plus CT was superior to CT alone as a measure of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) stenosis severity for determination of lesion-specific ischemia. Finally, in the study, angiographic reference standard of the vessel lumen area was derived from MSCT analysis instead of invasive coronary angiography [1]. It is important, however, to note that there is an overestimation of stenosis severity identified by CCTA and even among severe stenosis confirmed by invasive coronary angiography, only a minority cause ischemia [4,6]. Therefore, the possible deviation resulted from the inaccurate reference of MSCT may make the results less convincible.

Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Imaging with 64-Slice Multislice Computed Tomography: Literature Review.

Coronary Stent Assessment with 64-Slice Multislice Computed Tomography: a Literature Review.

Evaluation of coronary bypass grafts with multislice spiral CT angiography

Graft failure prior to discharge after coronary artery bypass surgery: a prospective single-centre study using dual 64-slice computed tomography

[Clinical Application of 64-Slice CT in Evaluation of Vessel Before and after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery].

Evaluation of the Value of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts Using Multislice Spiral CT Angiograpyhy

Coronary Bypass Grafts Evaluation by Multi-Slice Spiral CT

Multi-slice CT Angiography: Its Application in Postoperative Check of Aortic Disease

The diagnostic value of 256-slice coronary CT angiography in the following-up of coronary artery bypass grafts

The Application of 64 Row Helical CT in the Follow-Up of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Diagnostic Value of 128-Slice Spiral CT Angiography for Bypass Grafts in Patients after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Accuracy of 64-slice CT for detecting coronary stenosis: comparison with coronary angiography

The Clinical Value of Sixteen-Detector Row Computed Tomography Angiography for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft

Early silent coronary bypass graft occlusion following coronary bypass surgery, implication of routine coronary computed tomography angiography

Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive Coronary Artery Angiogaphy Using 64 Multi-Slice Computed Tomography on Coronary Atherosclerosis

Can Multislice Computed Tomography in an Asymptomatic High-Risk Population Really Impact on Therapeutic Decision-Making?

The Experiment Study of Coronary Artery Imaging by 64 Slice Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography with Pulsating Cardiac Phantom

Challenges in Multislice Computed Tomography Based Fractional Flow Reserve to Evaluate Interventional Treatment

Retrospectively Electrocardiographically-Gated Reconstructed Multi-Slice Spiral CT Coronary Angiography:Optimal R-R Phase and Clinical Application

Graft Failure After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Its Association With Patient Characteristics and Clinical Events: A Pooled Individual Patient Data Analysis of Clinical Trials With Imaging Follow-Up

The Diagnostic Value of 64-slice Spiral Computed Tomography to Coronary Heart Disease