Abstract:Abstract Cell signal networks are orchestrated directly or indirectly by various peptide-mediated protein–protein interactions, which are normally weak and transient and thus ideal for biological regulation and medicinal intervention. Here, we develop a general-purpose method for modeling and predicting the binding affinities of protein–peptide interactions (PpIs) at the structural level. The method is a hybrid strategy that employs an unsupervised approach to derive a layered PpI atom–residue interaction (ulPpI[a-r]) potential between different protein atom types and peptide residue types from thousands of solved PpI complex structures and then statistically correlates the potential descriptors with experimental affinities (KD values) over hundreds of known PpI samples in a supervised manner to create an integrated unsupervised–supervised PpI affinity (usPpIA) predictor. Although both the ulPpI[a-r] potential and usPpIA predictor can be used to calculate PpI affinities from their complex structures, the latter seems to perform much better than the former, suggesting that the unsupervised potential can be improved substantially with a further correction by supervised statistical learning. We examine the robustness and fault-tolerance of usPpIA predictor when applied to treat the coarse-grained PpI complex structures modeled computationally by sophisticated peptide docking and dynamics simulation. It is revealed that, despite developed solely based on solved structures, the integrated unsupervised–supervised method is also applicable for locally docked structures to reach a quantitative prediction but can only give a qualitative prediction on globally docked structures. The dynamics refinement seems not to change (or improve) the predictive results essentially, although it is computationally expensive and time-consuming relative to peptide docking. We also perform extrapolation of usPpIA predictor to the indirect affinity quantities of HLA-A*0201 binding epitope peptides and NHERF PDZ binding scaffold peptides, consequently resulting in a good and moderate correlation of the predicted KD with experimental IC50 and BLU on the two peptide sets, with Pearson’s correlation coefficients Rp = 0.635 and 0.406, respectively.

Structure-based prediction of protein–protein binding affinity with consideration of allosteric effect

Development of QSAR-Improved Statistical Potential for the Structure-Based Analysis of ProteinPeptide Binding Affinities

Biomacromolecular Quantitative Structure–activity Relationship (bioqsar): a Proof-of-concept Study on the Modeling, Prediction and Interpretation of Protein–protein Binding Affinity

Modeling protein-peptide recognition based on classical quantitative structure-affinity relationship approach: implication for proteome-wide inference of peptide-mediated interactions

Alloscore: A Method for Predicting Allosteric Ligand-Protein Interactions

Computational prediction of protein–protein binding affinities

Allosteric Type and Pathways Are Governed by the Forces of Protein-Ligand Binding

Quantitative Prediction of Protein-Protein Binding Affinity with A Potential of Mean Force Considering Volume Correction

A Novel Method for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction and the Related Descriptors Exploration.

Integrated unsupervised–supervised modeling and prediction of protein–peptide affinities at structural level

Prediction of Protein–protein Binding Affinity Using Diverse Protein–protein Interface Features

Harnessing Pre-trained Models for Accurate Prediction of Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity

Protein-ligand binding affinity prediction: Is 3D binding pose needed?

PLA-MoRe: A Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Model via Comprehensive Molecular Representations

Does a More Precise Chemical Description of Protein–Ligand Complexes Lead to More Accurate Prediction of Binding Affinity?

In Silico Prediction of Compounds Binding to Human Plasma Proteins by QSAR Models

A knowledge-guided strategy for improving the accuracy of scoring functions in binding affinity prediction

Binding Affinity Prediction: From Conventional to Machine Learning-Based Approaches

A Functional Feature Analysis on Diverse Protein–protein Interactions: Application for the Prediction of Binding Affinity

DLSSAffinity: Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Via a Deep Learning Model

Side-chain Conformational Space Analysis (SCSA): A Multi Conformation-Based QSAR Approach for Modeling and Prediction of Protein–peptide Binding Affinities