Mechanisms for polyandry evolution in a complex social bee
Keith Delaplane,Katherine Hagan,Kevin Vogel,Lewis Bartlett,Delaplane, Keith
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-024-03450-x
2024-03-10
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
Abstract:Polyandry in social Hymenoptera is associated with reduced within-colony relatedness and increased colony-level ecologic fitness. One explanation for this sees increasing within-nest genetic diversity as a mechanism for improving group task efficiency and colony competitiveness. A queen on her mating flight captures nearly 90% of her breeding population's allele potential by her tenth effective mating ( m e ~ 10 males). Under this population allele capture (PAC) model, colony fitness gains track mating number in an asymptotic manner, leveling out after about the tenth mating. A supporting theory we call the genotype composition (GC) model sees genetic novelty at mating levels higher than the m e ~ 10 asymptote, the hyperpolyandry zone, resulting from unique genotype compositions whose number are potentially infinite. Colony fitness gains under the GC model will track mating number in a linear manner. We set up field colonies with Apis mellifera queens each instrumentally mated with 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, or 32 males, creating a polyandry gradient bracketing the qualitative divide of m e ~ 10, measured tokens of colony level fitness, and collected observation hive data. Our results lead us to conclude that (1) ancestral colony traits fundamental to eusociality (cooperative brood care) respond to mating level changes at or below m e ~ 10 in a manner consistent with the PAC model, whereas (2) more derived specialized colony phenotypes (resistance to the non-native parasite Varroa destructor ) continue improving with increasing m e in a manner consistent with the GC model. By either model, (3) the mechanism for increasing colony fitness is an increase in worker task specialisms and task efficiency.
ecology,zoology,behavioral sciences