Testing Avian Polygyny Hypotheses in Insects: Harem Size Distribution and Female Egg Gallery Spacing in Three Ips Bark Beetles

F Schlyter,QH Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3545748
1996-01-01
Oikos
Abstract:A majority of females in Ipini bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) mate polygynously, although larval competition within harems with >2 females is expected to reduce female reproductive success. Models generated for territorial polygyny in birds were examined in order to explain polygyny in bark beetles. At the same time, a test of the general validity of the avian models on an unrelated group of animals is provided. Three levels of models were tested in three Ips spp; 1) male coercion/female choice, 2) cost/no cost of polygyny, and 3) unequal sex-ratio (female biased). A fourth level; compensation/no compensation of female costs could be partly tested. In Ips typographus, I. cembrae, and I. duplicatus mean harem sizes were between 1.9 and 2.8, but between 51 and 79% of females were in galleries with harem size (H) >2. The hypothesis of male coercion (1) was not supported due to the non-Poisson distributions of H and the biology of bark living, where females can easily escape male dominance, in favour of female choice. A cost of polygyny (2) was demonstrated: Female egg tunnels were too closely spaced within harems to allow all eggs to develop into adults and the distance between egg tunnels were 50-100% greater between harems than within harems. The unbalanced sex-ratio hypothesis (3) could be rejected because a sizable fraction (3-35%) of males were unpaired or had H < 2 in the field. At an extreme sex-ratio of 6:1: in the laboratory still as many as 31% of males had only one or two females. On the fourth level (4), compensation of female cost was best supported, but a limitation of compensation by choice due to a 'search-cost' limitation could not be ruled out. 'Deception' hypotheses were ruled out: Female egg tunnels were oriented more evenly than random between the sides of the gallery and eggs were predominantly laid (70%) on sides without within-harem competition. Thus, females acted adaptively based on knowledge of their position relative to other harem females. The compensation for females could be of 'sexy-sons' type in I. typographus, as males with higher H may have higher pheromone content. It is concluded that on the three first levels the 1) coercion, 2) no cost of polygyny, and 3) biased sex-ratio hypotheses could be rejected, while on the fourth level compensation was favoured.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?