Improved Sensitivity in a Search for the Rare Decay KL0-->e+e-

K ARISAKA,LB AUERBACH,S AXELROD,J BELZ,KA BIERY,P BUCHHOLZ,MD CHAPMAN,RD COUSINS,MV DIWAN,M ECKHAUSE,JF GINKEL,C GUSS,AD HANCOCK,AP HEINSON,VL HIGHLAND,GW HOFFMANN,J HORVATH,GM IRWIN,D JOYCE,T KAARSBERG,JR KANE,CJ KENNEY,SH KETTELL,WW KINNISON,P KNIBBE,J KONIGSBERG,Y KUANG,K LANG,DM LEE,J MARGULIES,C MATHIAZHAGAN,WK MCFARLANE,RJ MCKEE,P MELESE,EC MILNER,WR MOLZON,DA OUIMETTE,PJ RILEY,JL RITCHIE,P RUBIN,GH SANDERS,AJ SCHWARTZ,M SIVERTZ,WE SLATER,J URHEIM,WF VULCAN,DL WAGNER,RE WELSH,RJ WHYLEY,RG WINTER,MT WITKOWSKI,SG WOJCICKI,A YAMASHITA,HJ ZIOCK
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.71.3910
IF: 8.6
1993-01-01
Physical Review Letters
Abstract:In a search for the decay K(L)0 --> e+e-, no candidates have been observed. We determine the sensitivity from the detected number of CP-violating K(L)0 --> pi+pi- decays and place a 90% confidence level upper limit on the branching ratio of B(K(L)0 --> e+e-, \M(K) - M(ee)\; < 6 MeV/c2) less-than-or-equal-to 4.1 x 10(-11). This result is a significant improvement over previous measurements, although still above the standard model prediction of 3 x 10(-12).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?