Observation of the decay ψ(2S)→K∗(892)K¯+c.c.
M. Ablikim,J.Z. Bai,Y. Ban,J.G. Bian,X. Cai,J.F. Chang,H.F. Chen,H.S. Chen,H.X. Chen,J.C. Chen,Jin Chen,Jun Chen,M.L. Chen,Y.B. Chen,S.P. Chi,Y.P. Chu,X.Z. Cui,H.L. Dai,Y.S. Dai,Z.Y. Deng,L.Y. Dong,S.X. Du,Z.Z. Du,J. Fang,S.S. Fang,C.D. Fu,H.Y. Fu,C.S. Gao,Y.N. Gao,M.Y. Gong,W.X. Gong,S.D. Gu,Y.N. Guo,Y.Q. Guo,Z.J. Guo,F.A. Harris,K.L. He,M. He,X. He,Y.K. Heng,H.M. Hu,T. Hu,G.S. Huang,L. Huang,X.P. Huang,X.B. Ji,Q.Y. Jia,C.H. Jiang,X.S. Jiang,D.P. Jin,S. Jin,Y. Jin,Y.F. Lai,F. Li,G. Li,H.H. Li,J. Li,J.C. Li,Q.J. Li,R.B. Li,R.Y. Li,S.M. Li,W.G. Li,X.L. Li,X.Q. Li,X.S. Li,Y.F. Liang,H.B. Liao,C.X. Liu,F. Liu,Fang Liu,H.M. Liu,J.B. Liu,J.P. Liu,R.G. Liu,Z.A. Liu,Z.X. Liu,F. Lu,G.R. Lu,J.G. Lu,C.L. Luo,X.L. Luo,F.C. Ma,J.M. Ma,L.L. Ma,Q.M. Ma,X.Y. Ma,Z.P. Mao,X.H. Mo,J. Nie,Z.D. Nie,S.L. Olsen,H.P. Peng,N.D. Qi,C.D. Qian,H. Qin,J.F. Qiu,Z.Y. Ren,G. Rong,L.Y. Shan,L. Shang,D.L. Shen,X.Y. Shen,H.Y. Sheng,F. Shi,X. Shi,H.S. Sun,S.S. Sun,Y.Z. Sun,Z.J. Sun,X. Tang,N. Tao,Y.R. Tian,G.L. Tong,G.S. Varner,D.Y. Wang,J.Z. Wang,K. Wang,L. Wang,L.S. Wang,M. Wang,P. Wang,P.L. Wang,S.Z. Wang,W.F. Wang,Y.F. Wang,Zhe Wang,Z. Wang,Zheng Wang,Z.Y. Wang,C.L. Wei,D.H. Wei,N. Wu,Y.M. Wu,X.M. Xia,X.X. Xie,B. Xin,G.F. Xu,H. Xu,Y. Xu,S.T. Xue,M.L. Yan,F. Yang,H.X. Yang,J. Yang,S.D. Yang,Y.X. Yang,M. Ye,M.H. Ye,Y.X. Ye,L.H. Yi,Z.Y. Yi,C.S. Yu,G.W. Yu,C.Z. Yuan,J.M. Yuan,Y. Yuan,Q. Yue,S.L. Zang,Yu Zeng,Y. Zeng,B.X. Zhang,B.Y. Zhang,C.C. Zhang,D.H. Zhang,H.Y. Zhang,J. Zhang,J.Y. Zhang,J.W. Zhang,L.S. Zhang,Q.J. Zhang,S.Q. Zhang,X.M. Zhang,X.Y. Zhang,Y.J. Zhang,Y.Y. Zhang,Yiyun Zhang,Z.P. Zhang,Z.Q. Zhang,D.X. Zhao,J.B. Zhao,J.W. Zhao,M.G. Zhao,P.P. Zhao,W.R. Zhao,X.J. Zhao,Y.B. Zhao,Z.G. Zhao,H.Q. Zheng,J.P. Zheng,L.S. Zheng,Z.P. Zheng,X.C. Zhong,B.Q. Zhou,G.M. Zhou,L. Zhou,N.F. Zhou,K.J. Zhu,Q.M. Zhu,Y.C. Zhu,Y.S. Zhu,Yingchun Zhu,Z.A. Zhu,B.A. Zhuang,B.S. Zou
2005-01-01
Abstract:Abstract Using 14 million ψ ( 2 S ) events collected with the BESII detector, branching fractions of ψ ( 2 S ) → K ∗ ( 892 ) + K − + c.c. and K ∗ ( 892 ) 0 K ¯ 0 + c.c. are determined to be: B ( ψ ( 2 S ) → K ∗ ( 892 ) + K − + c.c. ) = ( 2.9 −1.7 +1.3 ± 0.4 ) × 10 −5 and B ( ψ ( 2 S ) → K ∗ ( 892 ) 0 K ¯ 0 + c.c. ) = ( 13.3 −2.7 +2.4 ± 1.7 ) × 10 −5 . The results confirm the violation of the “12% rule” for these two decay channels. A large isospin violation between the charged and neutral modes is observed.