Higher-Statistics Measurement Of The Branching Ratio For The Decay Kl0-]Mu-Mu

A. Heinson,J. Horvath,C. Mathiazhagan,W. Molzon,K. Arisaka,R. Cousins,T. Kaarsberg,J. Konigsberg,P. Rubin,W. Slater,D. Wagner,W. Kinnison,D. Lee,R. McKee,E. Milner,G. Sanders,H. Ziock,P. Knibbe,J. Urheim,K. Biery,M. Diwan,G. Irwin,K. Lang,J. Margulies,D. Ouimette,A. Schwartz,S. Wojcicki,L. Auerbach,J. Belz,P. Buchholz,V. Highland,W. McFarlane,M. Sivertz,J. Ritchie,A. Yamashita,M. Chapman,M. Eckhause,J. Ginkel,A. Hancock,J. Kane,C. Kenney,Y. Kuang,W. Vulcan,R. Welsh,R. Whyley,R. Winter
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.44.R1
IF: 5.407
1991-01-01
Physical Review D
Abstract:With a significant increase in experimental sensitivity, we have observed an additional 281 K(L)0 --> mu-mu events after a background subtraction of 19 +/- 6 events. Normalizing this sample to the simultaneous observation of the decay K(L)0 --> pi+ pi-, we obtain the branching ratio B(K(L)0 --> mu-mu) = [7.6 +/- 0.5(stat) +/- 0.4(syst)] x 10(-9). Combining these data with our previously published sample containing 87 events yields B(K(L)0 --> mu-mu) = (7.0 +/- 0.5) x 10(-9).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?