Evaluation of Sonomyography (SMG) for Control Compared with Electromyography (EMG) in a Discrete Target Tracking Task.

Jing-Yi Guo,Yong-Ping Zheng,Laurence P. Kenney,Hong-Bo Xie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/iembs.2009.5332398
2009-01-01
Abstract:Most of the commercial upper-limb externally powered prosthetic devices are controlled by electromyography (EMG) signals. We previously proposed using the real-time change of muscle thickness detected using ultrasound, namely sonomyography (SMG), for the control of prostheses. In this study, we compared the performance of subjects using 1-D SMG signal and surface EMG signal, using a discrete target tracking protocol involving a series of letter cancellation tasks. Each task involved using grip force, EMG or SMG from a wrist extensor muscle to move a cursor to one of 5 locations on a computer screen, at the first four of which were located a letter and last of which was a word of "NEXT". The target was defined by the location showing the letter "E" and, once the subject reached this target, they were instructed to "cancel" the E from the screen, using a button operated by the contralateral hand. A paired t-test revealed that the percentage of letters correctly cancelled with force/angle and SMG signal in isometric force control, and with SMG in wrist extension were significantly higher than with EMG (P<0.05) for both isometric control and wrist extension. The results suggest that SMG signal has great potential as an alternative to EMG for prosthetic control.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?