Abstract:In his classic work The Mind and its Place in Nature published in 1925 at the height of the development of quantum mechanics but several years after the chemists Lewis and Langmuir had already laid the foundations of the modern theory of valence with the introduction of the covalent bond, the analytic philosopher C. D. Broad argued for the emancipation of chemistry from the crass physicalism that led physicists then and later—with support from a rabblement of philosophers who knew as much about chemistry as etymologists—to believe that chemistry reduced to physics. Here Broad’s thesis is recast in terms more familiar to chemists. In the hard sell of particle physics, several prominent figures in chemistry—Hoffmann, Primas, and Pauling—have had their views interpreted to imply that they were sympathetic to greedy reductionism when in fact they were not. Indeed, being chemists without physicists as alter egos, they could not but side with Broad’s contention that chemistry, as a science that deals primarily in emergent phenomena which are beyond the purview of physicalism, owes no acquiescence to particle physics and its ethereal wares. Historically, among the most widely used expediencies in chemistry and materials science are additivity or mixture rules and their cohort transferability, all of which are devised and used under the mantle of naive reductionism. Here it is argued that while the transfer of functional groups between molecules works empirically to an extent, it is strictly outlawed by the no-cloning theorem of quantum mechanics. Several illustrative examples related to chemistry’s irreducibility to physics are presented and discussed. The failure of naive reductionism exhibited by the deep-inelastic scattering of leptons by A > 2 nuclei is traced to the same flawed reasoning that was the original basis of Moffitt’s ‘atoms in molecules’ hypothesis, the neglect of context, nuclei in the case of high-energy physics and molecules in the case of chemistry. A non-exhaustive list of other contexts from physics, chemistry, and molecular biology evidencing similar departures from the ideal of additivity or reductionism is provided for the perusal of philosophers. Had the call by the mathematician J. T. Schwartz for developments in mathematical linguistics possessed of a less single, less literal, and less simple-minded nature been met, perhaps it might have persuaded scientists to abandon their regressive fixation with unphysical reductionism and to adapt to new methodologies that engender a more nuanced handling of ubiquitous emergent phenomena as they arise in Nature than is the case today.

Mechanisms and Reduction in Organic Chemistry

Reduction, Emergence and Physicalism

Towards Developing High-Fidelity Yet Compact Skeletal Mechanisms: an Effective, Efficient and Expertise-Free Strategy for Systematic Mechanism Reduction

A weakened mechanism is still a mechanism: on the causal role of absences in mechanistic explanation

The emancipation of chemistry

Mechanism and Biological Explanation

The challenges of purely mechanistic models in biology and the minimum need for a 'mechanism-plus-X' framework

Mechanisms after the end of New Mechanism

Computational Organic Chemistry: Bridging Theory and Experiment in Establishing the Mechanisms of Chemical Reactions.

A directed relation graph method for mechanism reduction

Derivation of a quantitative minimal model from a detailed elementary-step mechanism supported by mathematical coupling analysis

Exploring Mechanistic Reasoning in Chemistry

Organic reaction mechanism classification using machine learning

A Philosophical Analysis of the Concept of "Reduction"

The New Mechanistic Approach and Cognitive Ontology—Or: What Role do (Neural) Mechanisms Play in Cognitive Ontology?

Reductionism and its heuristics: Making methodological reductionism honest

The concept of mechanism in biology

Pseudo‐mechanistic Explanations in Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience

Mechanistic explanation and the integration between language and action

Opinion: Challenges and needs of tropospheric chemical mechanism development

Model reduction in chemical dynamics: slow invariant manifolds, singular perturbations, thermodynamic estimates, and analysis of reaction graph