Abstract:Despite the recent success of neural network models in mimicking animal performance on various tasks, critics worry that these models fail to illuminate brain function. We take it that a central approach to explanation in systems neuroscience is that of mechanistic modeling, where understanding the system requires us to characterize its parts, organization, and activities, and how those give rise to behaviors of interest. However, it remains controversial what it takes for a model to be mechanistic, and whether computational models such as neural networks qualify as explanatory on this approach. We argue that certain kinds of neural network models are actually good examples of mechanistic models, when an appropriate notion of mechanistic mapping is deployed. Building on existing work on model-to-mechanism mapping (3M), we describe criteria delineating such a notion, which we call 3M++. These criteria require us, first, to identify an abstract level of description that is still detailed enough to be "runnable", and then, to construct model-to-brain mappings using the same principles as those employed for brain-to-brain mapping across individuals. Perhaps surprisingly, the abstractions required are just those already in use in experimental neuroscience and deployed in the construction of more familiar computational models – just as the principles of inter-brain mappings are very much in the spirit of those already employed in the collection and analysis of data across animals. In a companion paper, we address the relationship between optimization and intelligibility, in the context of functional evolutionary explanations. Taken together, mechanistic interpretations of computational models and the dependencies between form and function illuminated by optimization processes can help us to understand why brain systems are built they way they are.

Mechanistic explanation and the integration between language and action

Advancing mechanistic explanations through natural and artificial embodied cognitive systems

Models and mechanisms in psychological explanation

Mechanisms of skillful interaction: sensorimotor enactivism & mechanistic explanation

Mechanisms after the end of New Mechanism

Theoretical strategies for an embodied cognitive neuroscience: Mechanistic explanations of brain-body-environment systems

A touch with words: Dynamic synergies between manual actions and language

Pseudo‐mechanistic Explanations in Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience

Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue

Beyond embodiment: Rethinking the integration of cognitive neuroscience and mechanistic explanations

Action in cognition: The case of language

Mechanism and Biological Explanation

Are language–cognition interactions bigger than a breadbox? Integrative modeling and design space thinking temper simplistic questions about causally dense phenomena

A weakened mechanism is still a mechanism: on the causal role of absences in mechanistic explanation

The Embodied Theory of Language : Evidence and Constrains

Mechanisms and Causal Histories: Explanation-Oriented Research in Human Ecology

Explanatory models in neuroscience, Part 1: Taking mechanistic abstraction seriously

Incorporating individual differences into a mechanistic embodied cognitive neuroscience

The New Mechanistic Approach and Cognitive Ontology—Or: What Role do (Neural) Mechanisms Play in Cognitive Ontology?

The concept of mechanism in biology

The Embodied Crossmodal Self Forms Language and Interaction: A Computational Cognitive Review