Abstract:In calculations of chemically reactive flows, dimension reduction of reactive systems via the use of slow attracting manifolds is an effective approach to reducing the computational burden. In the reduced description, the reactive system is described in terms of a smaller number of reduced composition variables (e.g., some major species) instead of the full composition (i.e., the full set of chemical species), and the evolution equations for the reduced composition variables are solved. In this work, we address the issues arising from the use of chemistry-based slow manifolds in inhomogeneous reactive flows. Chemistry-based slow manifolds are identified (or constructed) based solely on chemical kinetics (i.e., based on homogeneous reactive systems) without accounting for transport processes such as convection and molecular diffusion. For a class of reaction–diffusion systems, by perturbation analysis, it is shown that three different mechanisms contribute to pulling compositions off the chemistry-based slow manifolds, namely, noninvariance, dissipation–curvature, and differential diffusion effects. As the names indicate, these mechanisms contribute, respectively, if the manifold is not invariant; if the manifold is curved (and there is nonzero molecular diffusion); and if the diffusivities of the species differ. In the regime where the fast chemical time scales are smaller than the physical time scales, the composition perturbations off the slow manifold by these three mechanisms are small. However, these three seemingly small perturbations introduce three generally nontrivial terms into the governing equations for the reduced compositions, which in general are of leading order. Moreover, for the convection–reaction–diffusion systems, we validate the close-parallel assumption [Z. Ren, S.B. Pope, A. Vladimirsky, J.M. Guckenheimer, Proc. Combust. Inst. (2007), doi:10.1016/j.proci.2006.07.106] to account for these effects in the reduced description. It is shown that with the use of the close-parallel assumption, the reduced description agrees well with the full reactive system. Different scenarios where these three effects could be neglected are also discussed.

Model reduction in chemical dynamics: slow invariant manifolds, singular perturbations, thermodynamic estimates, and analysis of reaction graph

Reduction of Chemical Reaction Networks with Approximate Conservation Laws

Graph-based, dynamics-preserving reduction of (bio)chemical systems

On fundamental unifying concepts for trajectory-based slow invariant attracting manifold computation in multiscale models of chemical kinetics

Reduction of dynamical biochemical reaction networks in computational biology

Inference of Complex Reaction Mechanisms Applying Model Reduction Techniques

Model-order reduction of biochemical reaction networks

Minimal Curvature Trajectories: Riemannian Geometry Concepts for Model Reduction in Chemical Kinetics

Methods of Model Reduction for Large-Scale Biological Systems: A Survey of Current Methods and Trends

The use of slow manifolds in reactive flows

Natural Model Reduction for Kinetic Equations

Numerical and computational analysis on a dissipative dynamical system: Slow invariant manifold for complex chemical mechanism

Thermodynamics for Reduced Models of Chemical Reactions by PEA and QSSA

On Projection-Based Model Reduction of Biochemical Networks-- Part I: The Deterministic Case

Structure based model reduction in real-time optimization

A hybrid approach to model reduction of Generalized Langevin Dynamics

Model reduction for stochastic chemical systems with abundant species

Quasichemical Models of Multicomponent Nonlinear Diffusion

Decoupled Species and Reaction Reduction: An error-controlled method for Dynamic Adaptive Chemistry simulations

Hunting $\varepsilon$: The origin and validity of quasi-steady-state reductions in enzyme kinetics