Abstract:Objective·To evaluate the abnormal rates of measured/predicted values of forced expiratory volume in 0.5 second (FEV0.5) and FEV0.75 in lung ventilation function testing, as well as the clinical significance of different cut-off points for improvement rates before and after bronchodilation testing in the diagnosis of children with bronchial asthma (asthma).Methods·From January 2020 to February 2021, school-age children diagnosed with asthma during their hospitalization at the Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine were selected. The data on lung ventilation function testing and bronchodilator testing were collected. The difference in abnormal rates of measured/predicted values of FEVt in children in lung ventilation function testing was compared. Diagnostic test four grid table was used to analyze the sensitivity and specificity of different cut-off points for the improvement rates of FEV0.5 and FEV0.75 in the diagnosis of asthma before and after bronchodilation testing.Results·A total of 148 children were included. All enrolled cases completed lung ventilation function testing, with 51 cases completing bronchodilation testing simultaneously. The results of lung ventilation function testing showed that 21 patients had obstructive ventilation dysfunction, 30 patients had small airway dysfunction, and the remaining patients had normal, restrictive or mixed ventilation dysfunction. The results of bronchodilation testing showed that in the 51 asthmatic children with obstructive ventilation dysfunction and small airway dysfunction, 22 of them were positive for bronchodilation testing. The comparison of the abnormal rates of FEVt measured/predicted values showed that the abnormal rates of FEV0.75 measured/predicted values were higher than those of FEV1 and FEV0.5 (χ2=10.18, P=0.000; χ2=10.95, P=0.000). The sensitivity and specificity analysis results of different cut-off points for the improvement rates of EFV0.75 and FEV0.5 showed that the cut-off point for FEV0.5 improvement rate at 16% had very high sensitivity and specificity, with the highest Jordan index; the cut-off points for FEV0.75 improvement rate were 12% and 14%, respectively, with sensitivity and specificity reaching 100%.Conclusion·The measured/predicted value of FEV0.75 in lung ventilation function testing can be considered as an alternative indicator for the measured/predicted value of FEV1 to further evaluate the presence of obstructive ventilation dysfunction. On the basis of the results of bronchodilation testing, it can be considered to analyze the airway reversibility by combining the best cut-off points of FEV0.75 and FEV0.5 improvement rates, in order to enhance the clinical value of bronchodilation testing in the diagnosis of asthma.

Analysis of Forced Expiratory Flow Signals Using the New Luus–Jaakola Optimization Procedure

Clinical significance of FEV0.5 and FEV0.75 in the determination of pulmonary function in children with bronchial asthma

A study on the end criteria of forced vital capacity curve in adults

Analysis of Forced Expiratory Volume in Six Seconds in Spirometry

Quantifying tidal expiratory flow limitation using a vector-based analysis technique

FEV_6 as A Surrogate for FVC in the Diagnosis for Mild-Moderate Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Quality Control of Forced Vital Capacity Measurement in Elderly Patients

The Value of Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide and Forced Mid-Expiratory Flow As Predictive Markers of Bronchial Hyperresponsiveness in Adults with Chronic Cough.

Detection of expiratory flow limitation by expiratory negative pressure technique in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Clinical Impact of the Lower Limit of Normal of FEV1/FVC on Detecting Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Follow-Up Study Based on Cross-Sectional Data.

Forced Oscillation Technique: a surrogate measure of lung function in neuromuscular disease patients?

Accuracy of forced oscillation technique to assess lung function in geriatric COPD population

Validation of the flow index to detect low inspiratory effort during pressure support ventilation

Should FEV1/FEV6 replace FEV1/FVC ratio to detect airway obstruction? A metaanalysis.

Effects of the nasal passage on forced oscillation lung function measurements

Forced Expiratory Flow at 25%-75% Links COPD Physiology to Emphysema and Disease Severity in the SPIROMICS Cohort

[Analysis of flow-volume curves in asthmatic patients and their application in pharmacodynamic tests (author's transl)]

Low Frequency Forced Oscillation Lung Function Test Can Distinguish Dynamic Tissue Non-linearity in COPD Patients

The value of small airway function parameters and fractional exhaled nitric oxide for predicting positive methacholine challenge test in asthmatics of different ages with FEV<sub>1</sub> 80% predicted

Reference Values for Peak Expiratory Flow Meter in Chinese Aged 4 to 80 Year

Estimated calculation of expiratory time constants for expiratory resistance evaluation during noninvasive positive pressure ventilation