Abstract:Over the last decades, the traditional 'Homo economicus' model has been increasingly challenged by convergent evidence underscoring the impact of emotions on decision-making. A classic example is the perception of unfairness operationalized in the Ultimatum Game where humans readily sacrifice personal gains to punish those who violate fairness norms. While the emotional mechanism underlying costly punishments has been widely acknowledged, the distinct contributions of moral emotions (anger or disgust) remain debated, partly due to methodological limitations of the conventional experiments. Here, we capitalize on a quantitative neurofunctional dissection approach by combining recent developments in neuroimaging meta-analyses, behavioral-level, network-level, and neurochemical-level decoding and data from 3,266 participants from functional neuroimaging studies to determine the common and distinct neural representations between unfairness and the two moral emotions. Experience of unfairness engaged a widespread bilateral network encompassing insular, cingulate, and frontal regions, with dorsal striatal regions mediating the decision to reject unfair offers. Disgust engaged a defensive-avoidance circuit encompassing amygdalar, occipital, and frontal regions, while anger engaged non-overlapping systems including mid-cingulate, thalamic, and frontal regions. Unfairness and anger or disgust respectively commonly engaged the anterior and mid-insula, while the latter additionally showed common recruitment of ventrolateral prefrontal and orbitofrontal cortices. Multimodal network, behavioral, and serotonergic decoding provided a more granular and convincing dissection of these results. Findings indicate a shared neuroaffective basis underlying the impact of emotions on unfairness-induced punishment behavior and suggest a common brain circuit has been evolutionarily shaped to protect individuals from personal harm and enforce societal norms.

Neural Basis of Increased Costly Norm Enforcement under Adversity.

Neural Signatures of Fairness‐related Normative Decision Making in the Ultimatum Game: A Coordinate‐based Meta‐analysis

Increased Neural Responses to Unfairness in a Loss Context

Power to Punish Norm Violations Affects the Neural Processes of Fairness-Related Decision Making

The Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms Underlying Norm-Enforcement Behaviors under Social Observation.

Sex-based differences in fairness norm compliance and neural circuitry

Neural Correlates of Decision Making after Unfair Treatment.

The Neural Signatures of Egocentric Bias in Normative Decision-Making

Neural Responses to Unfairness and Fairness Depend on Self-Contribution to the Income.

Punishment cost affects third-parties' behavioral and neural responses to unfairness

Context Modulates Perceived Fairness in Altruistic Punishment: Neural Signatures from ERPs and EEG Oscillations

Intention Modulates the Effect of Punishment Threat in Norm Enforcement via the Lateral Orbitofrontal Cortex.

The Neurocomputational Mechanism Underlying Decision-Making on Unfairness to Self and Others

Gender Differences in Behavioral and Neural Responses to Unfairness Under Social Pressure

Neural Mechanisms Underlying Social Conformity in an Ultimatum Game

Neural Correlates of Proposers’ Fairness Perception in Punishment and Non-Punishment Economic Games

Social Support Modulates Neural Responses to Unfairness in the Ultimatum Game.

Does Unfairness Evoke Anger or Disgust? A Quantitative Neurofunctional Dissection Based on 25 Years of Neuroimaging

Social status modulates the neural response to unfairness

You Are Excusable! Neural Correlates of Economic Neediness on Empathic Concern and Fairness Perception.

Distinct neural computations scale the violation of expected reward and emotion in social transgressions