Abstract:Under resource distribution context, individuals have a strong aversion to unfair treatment not only toward themselves but also toward others. However, there is no clear consensus regarding the commonality and distinction between these two types of unfairness. Moreover, many neuroimaging studies have investigated how people evaluate and respond to unfairness in the abovementioned two contexts, but the consistency of the results remains to be investigated. To resolve these two issues, we sought to summarize existing findings regarding unfairness to self and others and to further elucidate the neural underpinnings related to distinguishing evaluation and response processes through meta-analyses of previous neuroimaging studies. Our results indicated that both types of unfairness consistently activate the affective and conflict-related anterior insula (AI) and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex/supplementary motor area (dACC/SMA), but the activations related to unfairness to self appeared stronger than those related to others, suggesting that individuals had negative reactions to both unfairness and a greater aversive response toward unfairness to self. During the evaluation process, unfairness to self activated the bilateral AI, dACC, and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), regions associated with unfairness aversion, conflict, and cognitive control, indicating reactive, emotional and automatic responses. In contrast, unfairness to others activated areas associated with theory of mind, the inferior parietal lobule and temporoparietal junction (IPL-TPJ), suggesting that making rational judgments from the perspective of others was needed. During the response, unfairness to self activated the affective-related left AI and striatum, whereas unfairness to others activated cognitive control areas, the left DLPFC and the thalamus. This indicated that the former maintained the traits of automaticity and emotionality, whereas the latter necessitated cognitive control. These findings provide a fine-grained description of the common and distinct neurocognitive mechanisms underlying unfairness to self and unfairness to others. Overall, this study not only validates the inequity aversion model but also provides direct evidence of neural mechanisms for neurobiological models of fairness.

Gender Differences in Behavioral and Neural Responses to Unfairness Under Social Pressure

Social Support Modulates Neural Responses to Unfairness in the Ultimatum Game.

Increased Neural Responses to Unfairness in a Loss Context

The Time Course of Neural Responses to Social Versus Non-Social Unfairness in the Ultimatum Game

Proposers' Economic Status Affects Behavioral and Neural Responses to Unfairness

Whether others were treated equally affects neural responses to unfairness in the Ultimatum Game.

Neural Responses to Unfairness and Fairness Depend on Self-Contribution to the Income.

Power to Punish Norm Violations Affects the Neural Processes of Fairness-Related Decision Making

The Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Perception of Unfairness and Related Decision-Making Process

Neural Correlates of Decision Making after Unfair Treatment.

Sex-based differences in fairness norm compliance and neural circuitry

The Neurocomputational Mechanism Underlying Decision-Making on Unfairness to Self and Others

Social status modulates the neural response to unfairness

Social comparisons differentially affect fair and unfair processing in ultimatum bargaining

Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An ERP study

Neural Basis of Increased Costly Norm Enforcement under Adversity.

Brain responses to self- and other- unfairness under resource distribution context: Meta-analysis of fMRI studies

Influence of Empathic Concern on Fairness-Related Decision Making: Evidence from ERP

Beauty affects fairness: facial attractiveness alters neural responses to unfairness in the ultimatum game

Social Comparison Affects Brain Responses to Fairness in Asset Division: an ERP Study with the Ultimatum Game.

Low social status decreases the neural salience of unfairness