Abstract:Over the last decades, the traditional 'Homo economicus' model has been increasingly challenged by convergent evidence underscoring the impact of emotions on decision-making. A classic example is the perception of unfairness operationalized in the Ultimatum Game where humans readily sacrifice personal gains to punish those who violate fairness norms. While the emotional mechanism underlying costly punishments has been widely acknowledged, the distinct contributions of moral emotions (anger or disgust) remain debated, partly due to methodological limitations of the conventional experiments. Here, we capitalize on a quantitative neurofunctional dissection approach by combining recent developments in neuroimaging meta-analyses, behavioral-level, network-level, and neurochemical-level decoding and data from 3,266 participants from functional neuroimaging studies to determine the common and distinct neural representations between unfairness and the two moral emotions. Experience of unfairness engaged a widespread bilateral network encompassing insular, cingulate, and frontal regions, with dorsal striatal regions mediating the decision to reject unfair offers. Disgust engaged a defensive-avoidance circuit encompassing amygdalar, occipital, and frontal regions, while anger engaged non-overlapping systems including mid-cingulate, thalamic, and frontal regions. Unfairness and anger or disgust respectively commonly engaged the anterior and mid-insula, while the latter additionally showed common recruitment of ventrolateral prefrontal and orbitofrontal cortices. Multimodal network, behavioral, and serotonergic decoding provided a more granular and convincing dissection of these results. Findings indicate a shared neuroaffective basis underlying the impact of emotions on unfairness-induced punishment behavior and suggest a common brain circuit has been evolutionarily shaped to protect individuals from personal harm and enforce societal norms.

Distinct neural computations scale the violation of expected reward and emotion in social transgressions

Does Unfairness Evoke Anger or Disgust? A Quantitative Neurofunctional Dissection Based on 25 Years of Neuroimaging

Neural substrates of intention--consequence integration and its impact on reactive punishment in interpersonal transgression

Context Modulates Perceived Fairness in Altruistic Punishment: Neural Signatures from ERPs and EEG Oscillations

Dissociable neural signals for reward and emotion prediction errors

Intention Modulates the Effect of Punishment Threat in Norm Enforcement via the Lateral Orbitofrontal Cortex.

Neural mechanisms of the mood effects on third-party responses to injustice after unfair experiences

Resting-State Functional Connectivity Underlying Costly Punishment: A Machine-Learning Approach

Power to Punish Norm Violations Affects the Neural Processes of Fairness-Related Decision Making

Punishing unfairness: Rewarding or the organization of a reactively aggressive response?

On Difference Between Direct-Response Method and Strategy Method in Decision-Making: Behavioural and Neural Evidence in a Reward-Punishment Game

The Neurocomputational Mechanism Underlying Decision-Making on Unfairness to Self and Others

Neural Basis of Increased Costly Norm Enforcement under Adversity.

Neural Modulation of Social Distance on Third-Party Punishment

The Neural Dynamics Underlying the Interpersonal Effects of Emotional Expression on Decision Making.

The processing course of conflicts in third-party punishment: An event-related potential study.

Strengths of social ties modulate brain computations for third-party punishment

Disrupting the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Attenuates the Difference in Decision-Making for Altruistic Punishment Between the Gain and Loss Contexts

Distinct neural activation patterns underlie economic decisions in high and low psychopathy scorers

Neurocircuits underlying cognition–emotion interaction in a social decision making context

Trait Reward Sensitivity Modulates Connectivity with the Temporoparietal Junction and Anterior Insula during Strategic Decision Making