Abstract:Background: Moral evaluation is identified as the first stage in the theory of moral judgment, and academics believe that it may align with the social intuitionist model. This study aims to prove that the model's emotional dominance hypothesis applies to moral evaluation by presenting a computational decision-making model that mathematically formalizes this emotional dominance decision-making process. We also compared different types of valence evaluation tasks to test the emotional priority hypothesis. Methods: We used a convenience sampling method to randomly recruit 30 enrolled college students. The drift-diffusion model was employed to analyze reaction times for words with various emotional and moral valences Additionally, we designed different valence evaluation tasks based on the response relevance hypothesis and evaluated the processing order through reaction time comparisons. Results: The analysis revealed that the emotional mechanism of immoral evaluation differs from moral evaluation. An increase in emotional valence accelerates the speed of evidence accumulation (v) for moral evaluation (M = 1.21, 0.2% < 0 < 99.8%) but lowers decision caution (a) in immoral evaluation (M = −0.64, 96.1% < 0 < 3.9%). In contrast, moral valence does not have a significant influence on evaluation processes (v, M = −0.28, 72.1% < 0 < 27.9%; a, M = −0.32, 79.3% < 0 < 20.7%). Furthermore, We found no significant difference in reaction times between moral and immoral words in the emotional evaluation task (F(1,29) = 0.55, p = 0.464, partial η2 = 0.02), but a significant difference existed in the moral evaluation task (F(1,29) = 17.99, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.38), indicating that the tendency of relatively fast immoral evaluation in emotional evaluation tasks may be caused by emotional priority. Conclusions: Our findings support the intuitive model's emotional dominance hypothesis and introduce a new emotional mechanism into moral evaluation. This study clarifies the distinct emotional processes in moral and immoral evaluations, fills a gap in the research on moral evaluation, and offers insights into human decision-making in moral contexts.

Hierarchical drift‐diffusion modelling uncovers differences of valenced self‐evaluation

Temporal Distance,Automatic Activation of Self-discrepancy and Value Orientation

Contextual and Cultural Differences in Positive Thinking

The Relationship between Self-esteem Structure and Attentional Bias in Negative Feedback Condition

Self-judgment dissected: A computational modeling analysis of self-referential processing and its relationship to trait mindfulness facets and depression symptoms

Emotion-Driven Moral Evaluation: A Mechanistic Study Based on the Drift-Diffusion Model

Intertwining personal and reward relevance: evidence from the drift-diffusion model

The temporal profile of self-prioritization

Computational Modeling of Self-Referential Processing Reveals Domain General Associations with Adolescent Anxiety Symptoms

Modulation Of Self-Esteem In Self- And Other-Evaluations Primed By Subliminal And Supraliminal Faces

The computational and neural substrates of individual differences in impulsivity under loss framework

Computational modeling of social evaluative decision-making elucidates individual differences in adolescent anxiety

Outcome Evaluation in Social Comparison: When You Deviate from Others

Informing cognitive abstractions through neuroimaging: The neural drift diffusion model.

Clarifying Cognitive Control Deficits in Psychosis via Drift Diffusion Modeling and Attractor Dynamics

Neurocognitive predictors of self-reported reward responsivity and approach motivation in depression: A data-driven approach

A newly detected bias in self-evaluation

A Bayesian hierarchical diffusion model decomposition of performance in Approach-Avoidance Tasks

The influence of error detection and error significance on neural and behavioral correlates of error processing in a complex choice task

Brain Correlates of Self-Evaluation Deficits in Schizophrenia: A Combined Functional and Structural MRI Study

Complementary benefits of multivariate and hierarchical models for identifying individual differences in cognitive control