Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Background</h3>Right ventricular apex (RVA) is still the most common implanted site in the world. There are a large number of RVA pacing population who have been carrying dual-chamber permanent pacemaker (PPM) over decades. Comparison of left ventricular dyssynchrony, morphology and systolic function between RVA pacing population and healthy population is unknown.<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Method</h3>This case-control study enrolled 61 patients suffered from complete atrioventricular block (III°AVB) for replacement of dual-chamber PPM. Then, 61 healthy controls matched with PPM patients in gender, age, follow-up duration and complications were included. The lead impedance, pacing threshold and sensing were compared between at implantation and long-term follow-up. Left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony, morphology and systolic function were compared between RVA pacing population (RVA group) and healthy population (healthy group) at implantation (baseline) and follow-up. And clarify the predictors of LV systolic function in RVA group at follow-up.<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3>After 112.44 ± 34.94 months of follow-up, comparing with parameters at implantation, atrial lead impedance decreased significantly (690 ± 2397 Ω vs 613 ± 2257 Ω, p = 0.048); atrial pacing threshold has a increased trend and P-wave amplitude has a decreased trend, but there was no statistical differences; while, RVA ventricular lead threshold increased significantly (0.50 ± 0.23 V vs 0.91 ± 0.47 V, p < 0.001), impedance (902 ± 397 Ω vs 680 ± 257 Ω,p < 0.001) and R-wave amplitude (11.71 ± 9.40mv vs 7.00 ± 6.91 mv, p < 0.001) decreased significantly. Compared with healthy group, long-term RVA pacing significantly increased ventricular dyssynchrony (mean QRS duration, 156.21 ± 29.80 ms vs 97.08 ± 15.70 ms, p < 0.001), left atrium diameter (LAD, 40.61 ± 6.15 mm vs 37.49 ± 4.80 mm,p = 0.002), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD, 49.15 ± 5.93 mm vs 46.41 ± 3.80 mm,p = 0.003), left ventricular hypertrophy (LVMI, 121.86 ± 41.52 g/m2 vs 98.41 ± 25.29 g/m2,p < 0.001), significantly deteriorated degree of tricuspid regurgitation (p < 0.001), and significantly decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, 61.38 ± 8.10% vs 64.64 ± 5.85%, p = 0.012), but after long-term RVA pacing, the mean LVEF was still more than 50%. Long-term RVA group LVEF was negatively correlated with preimplantation LVMI (B = -0.055,t = −2.244,p = 0.029), LVMI at follow-up (B = −0.081,t = −3.864,p = 0.000) and tricuspid regurgitation at follow-up (B = −3.797,t = −3.599,p = 0.001).<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusion</h3>In conclusion, although long-term RVA pacing has significantly effects on left ventricular dyssynchrony, morphology and systolic function in III°AVB patients, the mean LVEF is still >50%. High preimplantation LVMI can predict the decline of LVEF.

Biventricular Pacing is Superior to Right Ventricular Pacing in Bradycardia Patients with Preserved Systolic Function: 2-Year Results of the Pace Trial

Long-term follow-up results of the pacing to avoid cardiac enlargement (PACE) trial.

The Pacing to Avoid Cardiac Enlargement (PACE) trial: clinical background, rationale, design, and implementation.

Feasibility and Outcomes of Upgrading to Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients with Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy and Infranodal Atrioventricular Block.

Biventricular Pacing in Patients with Bradycardia and Normal Ejection Fraction.

Feasibility and Safety of Both His Bundle Pacing and Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: Intermediate Term Follow-Up

Upgrade to his bundle pacing in pacing-dependent patients referred for pulse generator change: Feasibility and intermediate term follow up

His-bundle pacing vs biventricular pacing following atrioventricular nodal ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation and reduced ejection fraction: A multicenter, randomized, crossover study-The ALTERNATIVE-AF trial

Deterioration of Left Ventricular Systolic Function in Extended Pacing to Avoid Cardiac Enlargement (PACE) Trial: the Predictive Value of Early Systolic Dyssynchrony

Reduction of Unnecessary Right Ventricular Pacing by Managed Ventricular Pacing and Search AV+ Algorithms in Pacemaker Patients: 12-Month Follow-Up Results of a Randomized Study.

Is Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Pacing Superior To Right Ventricular Apex Pacing? A Long-Term Follow-Up Study

Comparison of Right Ventricular Apex and Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Septum Pacing in the Elderly with Normal Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: Long-Term Follow-Up

Effects of pacing on hemodynamics in right ventricular outflow tract

Comparison of acute changes in left ventricular volume, systolic and diastolic functions, and intraventricular synchronicity after biventricular and right ventricular pacing for heart failure.

THE SPECIFIC VALUE OF UPGRADING TO LEFT BUNDLE BRANCH PACING IN PATIENTS WITH PACING INDUCED CARDIOMYOPATHY OR NON-PACING INDUCED CARDIOMYOPATHY: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

Midterm Effects and Clinical Benefits of Left Ventricular Vs Biventricular Pacing in Heart Failure.

Effects of long-term right ventricular apex pacing on left ventricular dyssynchrony, morphology and systolic function

Comparison of clinical and echocardiographic outcomes between left bundle branch area pacing and right ventricular pacing in older patients

Effects of Right Ventricular Septum or His-bundle Pacing Versus Right Ventricular Apical Pacing on Cardiac Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Long-term efficacy of left bundle branch pacing and biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure complicated with left bundle branch block

[Long-Term Effects and Mortality of Biventricular Pacing Therapy in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure].