Abstract:Background: Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) with photon-counting x-ray detectors (PCDs) can be used to improve the classification of breast cancers as benign or malignant. Commercially-available PCD-based mammography systems use silicon-based PCDs. Cadmium-telluride (CdTe) PCDs may provide a practical advantage over silicon-based PCDs because they can be implemented as large-area detectors that are more easily adaptable to existing mammography systems. Purpose: The purpose of this work is to optimize CESM implemented with CdTe PCDs and to investigate the influence of the number of energy bins, electronic noise level, pixel size, and anode material on image quality. Methods: We developed a Monte Carlo model of the energy-bin-dependent modulation transfer functions (MTFs) and noise power spectra, including spatioenergetic noise correlations. We validated model predictions using a CdTe PCD with analog charge summing for charge-sharing suppression. Using the ideal-observer detectability, we optimized CESM for the task of detecting a 7-mm-diameter iodine nodule embedded in a breast with 50% glandularity. We optimized the tube voltage, beam filtration, and the location of energy thresholds for 50 and 100- μ $\mu$ m pixels, tungsten and molybdenum anodes, and two electronic noise levels. One of the electronic noise levels was that of the experimental system; the other was half that of the experimental system. Optimization was performed for CdTe PCDs with two or three energy bins. We also estimated the impact of anatomic noise due to background parenchymal enhancement and computed the minimum detectable iodine area density in the presence of quantum and anatomic noise. Results: Model predictions of the MTFs and noise power spectra agreed well with experiment. For optimized systems, adding a third energy bin increased quantum noise levels and reduced detectability by ∼55% compared to two-bin approaches that simply suppress contrast between fibroglandular and adipose tissue. Decreasing the electronic noise standard deviation from 3.4 to 1.7 keV increased iodine detectability by ∼5% and ∼30% for two-bin imaging and three-bin imaging, respectively. After optimizing for tube voltage, beam filtration, and the location of energy thresholds, there was ∼a 3% difference in iodine detectability between molybdenum and tungsten anodes for two-bin imaging, but for three-bin imaging, molybdenum anodes provided up to 14% increase in detectability relative to tungsten anodes. Anatomic noise decreased iodine detectability by 15% to 40%, with greater impact for lower electronic noise settings and larger pixel sizes. Conclusions: For CESM implemented with CdTe PCDs, (1) quantitatively-accurate three-material decompositions using three energy bins are associated with substantial increases in quantum noise relative to two-energy-bin approaches that simply suppress contrast between fibroglandular and adipose tissues; (2) tungsten and molybdenum anodes can provide nearly equal iodine detectability for two-bin imaging, but molybdenum provides a modest detectability advantage for three-bin imaging provided that all other technique parameters are optimized; (3) reducing pixel sizes from 100 to 50 μ $\mu$ m can reduce detectability by up to 20% due to charge sharing; (4) anatomic noise due to background parenchymal enhancement is estimated to have a substantial impact on lesion visibility, reducing detectability by approximately 30%.

Image noise sensitivity of dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging

An Analysis and Evaluation Method for Imaging Noise in Dual-Energy Digital Mammography

Conventional mammographic image generation in dual-energy digital mammography

Conventional Mammographic Image Generation Method with Increased Calcification Sensitivity Based on Dual-Energy

Algorithmic scatter correction in dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging

Algorithmic Scatter Correction In Dual-Energy Digital Mammography

Quantitative assessment of signal and noise properties of mammography digital detectors

SU‐C‐301‐05: Comparative Low‐Contrast Performance of Scan Equalization Digital Mammography (SEDM) V.s. Full‐Field Digital Mammography (FFDM): A Simulation Study with Micro‐Calcifications

SU‐FF‐I‐114: Effects of Exposure Level and Anatomical Background on Detection of Simulated Microcalcifications in Digital Mammography

Performance of dual-energy subtraction in contrast-enhanced mammography for three different manufacturers: a phantom study

Noise Suppression in Image-Domain Multi-Material Decomposition for Dual-Energy CT

Comparing eDQE and eNEQ metrics – is there an alternative approach to assessing image quality in digital mammography?

Task-based detectability in anatomical background in digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and synthetic mammography

Monte-Carlo study of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography with cadmium telluride photon-counting x-ray detectors

Noise characterization analysis of dynamic dual-energy CT and its advantage in suppressing statistical noise

Contrast and quantum noise in single-exposure dual-energy thoracic imaging with photon-counting x-ray detectors

Physical and dosimetric characterisation of different Contrast-Enhanced digital mammographic systems: A multicentric study

Performance evaluation of six digital mammography systems

The impact of calibration phantom errors on dual-energy digital mammography

Optimizing dual-energy CT technique for iodine-based contrast-to-noise ratio

Optimization of a dual-energy contrast-enhanced technique for a photon-counting digital breast tomosynthesis system: II. An experimental validation