Physical and dosimetric characterisation of different Contrast-Enhanced digital mammographic systems: A multicentric study

Caterina Ghetti,Ornella Ortenzia,Laura Pagan,Paola Golinelli,Andrea Nitrosi,Roberto Sghedoni,Valentina Ravaglia,Laura Verzellesi,Lidia Angelini,Giovanna Venturi,Paola Berardi,Domenico Acchiappati,Marco Bertolini

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103334

IF: 3.119

2024-03-25

Physica Medica

Abstract:Highlights • Multicentric physical and dosimetric characterisation of 4 different CEDM systems. • First measurements of the IMS-Giotto Class CEDM system are reported in this work. • Iodine quantification in CEDM on a dedicated phantom. Purpose Contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) is a relatively new imaging technique recombining low- and high-energy mammograms to emphasise iodine contrast. This work aims to perform a multicentric physical and dosimetric characterisation of four state-of-the-art CEDM systems. Methods We evaluated tube output, half-value-layer (HVL) for low- and high-energy and average glandular dose (AGD) in a wide range of equivalent breast thicknesses. CIRS phantom 022 was used to estimate the overall performance of a CEDM examination in the subtracted image in terms of the iodine difference signal (S). To calculate dosimetric impact of CEDM examination, we collected 4542 acquisitions on patients. Results Even if CEDM acquisition strategies differ, all the systems presented a linear behaviour between S and iodine concentration. The curve fit slopes expressed in PV/mg/cm 2 were in the range [92–97] for Fujifilm, [31–32] for GE Healthcare, [35–36] for Hologic, and [114–130] for IMS. Dosimetric data from patients were matched with AGD values calculated using equivalent PMMA thicknesses. Fujifilm exhibited the lowest values, while GE Healthcare showed the highest. Conclusion The subtracted image showed the ability of all the systems to give important information about the linearity of the signal with the iodine concentrations. All the patient-collected doses were under the AGD EUREF 2D Acceptable limit, except for patients with thicknesses ≤35 mm belonging to GE Healthcare and Hologic, which were slightly over. This work demonstrates the importance of testing each CEDM system to know how it performs regarding dose and the relationship between PV and iodine concentration.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging