Abstract:A robust multi-objective wing design optimization procedure using CFD is presented in this work. Instead of directly applying CFD to wing design optimization, a Kriging aerodynamic model that approximates CFD result is proposed to save computational cost. By introducing 6 sigma robust approach as a sub-objective function, multi-objective wing design problems can be solved with aerodynamic robustness. Non-Uniform Rational B-Spline curves (NURBS) are introduced to depict the wing geometry in design optimization process. The most important parameters of the wing geometry can then be screened by design of experiment and treated as design variables due to the local variation property of NURBS. Under this formulation, a multi-objective genetic algorithm based on non-dominated sorting is employed to handle multiple flight conditions in wing design. The optimum wing geometry is selected according to trade-off among design objects on the non-dominated front. To validate the proposed approach, two robust design optimization cases are studied for ONERA-M6-Wing. It turns out that the drag coefficient is insensitive to Mach number between Ma0.8-Ma0.9 after robust optimization. The result also verifies the effectiveness of our method in boosting performance and robustness of multiple flight conditions: the lift curve slope (Ma0.3) of optimum wing and the 6 sigma objective function of transonic drag (Ma0.8-Ma0.9) increase by 11.9% and 25.4%, respectively. Observations in the optimization cases are concluded as follows: 1) For wing aerodynamic design problems, the multi-objective robust optimization can both improve the performance at different flight conditions and provide robustness. 2) The Kriging aerodynamic model derived from CFD result can satisfy the precision requirement of wing design. 3) Even though the optimization result is subject to the weights of the 6 sigma function in sub-object, the influence is not comparable to the trade-off among design objects. 4) The optimum solution obtained by proposed approach is superior to gradient based optimization method, while the computational cost is acceptable.

A Robust Aeroelastic Optimization Method of Structure and Trim for Air Vehicle with Multiple Control Surfaces

Robust Aeroservoelastic Design with Structural and Trim Parameter Uncertainties

Robust structural design optimization of flexible backswept wings

Robust Design Optimization of Flexible Backswept Wings with Structural Uncertainties

Robust Design Optimization of an Aerospace Vehicle Prolusion System

Robust Aeroelastic Optimization Design of a Composite Wing

Aeroelastic Optimization Design for Wing with Maneuver Load Uncertainties

INTEGRATED OPTIMIZATION DESIGN OF MULTIPLE-CONTROL-SURFACE TRIM FOR ACTIVE AEROELASTIC WING

Aeroservoelastic Design Optimization of Flexible Wings

Aircraft Wing Structural Design Optimization Based on Automated Finite Element Modelling and Ground Structure Approach

Aeroelastic Two-Level Optimization for Preliminary Design of Wing Structures Considering Robust Constraints

An Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Transonic Wing Design Method for Aeroelastic System

An Aeroelastic Optimization Design Approach for Structural Configuration of Flying Wings

Aero-structural Optimization of Supersonic Wing under Thermal Environment Using Adjoint-Based Optimization Algorithm

Aerodynamic-structure Multidisciplinary Optimization Design of Wing Based on Response Surface Methodology

Robust optimization design of a flying wing using adjoint and uncertainty-based aerodynamic optimization approach

Optimization of Aeroengine Robust Controller Based on Adaptive Simulated Annealing Genetic Algorithm

Multi-point Aerodynamic Optimization Design Strategy of Rotor Airfoil With Multi-constrain Conditions

Robust optimization of control command for aerospace vehicles with aerodynamic uncertainty

Robust Multi-Objective Wing Design Optimization Via Cfd Approximation Model

Robust Design Optimization of a Two-Dimensional Airfoil with Deformable Trailing Edge