Abstract:[Purpose] This study investigates the association between ESG management and corporate risk-taking, and further examines how the level of corporate risk-taking affects the relationship between ESG management and firm value. Shareholders have an incentive to maximize profits through corporate risk-taking, but ESG management monitors and suppresses the excessive risk-taking by considering the benefits of not only shareholders but also various stakeholders around the firm and pursuing transparent governance and the promotion of social value. In addition, if ESG investment(insurance-like assets) increases, the amount invested in risky investments may relatively decrease, thereby reducing overall corporate risk-taking. However, on the other hand, since ESG activities generally involve investing in sectors that do not directly generate profits, managers may actively invest in risky businesses that can secure more profits to make up for these expenditures. Because such conflicting predictions are possible, the association between ESG management and corporate risk-taking is an issue which requires empirical analysis. [Methodology] A regression analysis was performed for domestic listed firms from 2012 to 2018 using ESG evaluation ratings provided by KCGS and corporate risk-taking variables measured by standard deviation of future profit rate. Also, this study investigates the effect of the interaction term between ESG and risk-taking level to examine the impact of corporate risk-taking on the relationship between ESG management and firm value. [Findings] This study finds that the higher ESG evaluation score, the lower corporate risk-taking, and this negative relationship was significant in the governance element among the three elements of environment, social, and governance. Additionally, a significantly positive relationship between ESG management and firm value exists only when the level of corporate risk-taking is low, and there is no such relationship when the level of corporate risk-taking is high. [Implications] This study contributes to the accounting literature by showing that ESG management affects corporate risk-taking related to investment activities and that ESG management has a positive impact on firm value only when excessive risk-taking is restrained.

CEO Ownership, External Governance, and Risk-taking

CEO Ownership and Valuation

Quality of Governance, Opportunity Costs, and CEO Compensation Structure

Does a CEO's private reputation impede corporate governance?

CEO Power and ESG Performance: The Mediating Role of Managerial Risk-Taking

Governance in the Executive Suite and Board Independence

Ultimate Ownership, Risk-Taking and Firm Value: Evidence from China

CEO Compensation , Hedging , and Firm Value

Governance in Executive Suites

Government Regulation, Corporate Board, and Firm Value: Evidence from China

Fifty shades of CEO duality: CEO personal risk preference, duality and corporate risk-taking

The Relationship Between Governance Mechanisms, Managerial Behaviors and Firm Performance

The stronger the ability, the greater the destructiveness? CEO ability and stock price crash risk

Relative Wealth Concerns and Executive Compensation

Firm value, ownership structure, and strategic approaches to ESG activities

Corporate Environmental Responsibilities and Executive Compensation: A Risk Management Perspective

Unintended Consequences of the Independent Board Requirement on CEO Power

Environmental, Social and Governance Performance: Analysis of CEO Power and Corporate Risk

The Association between ESG Management and Corporate Risk-taking, and Firm Value

Governance, CEO Power, and Relative Performance Evaluation Effectiveness