Abstract:the past two decades, increasing the influence of common shareholders has become a touchstone of good governance and shareholder democracy across the globe. Institutional activism combined with major regulatory overhauls has led shareholders to play a more active role in corporate decision-making. Yet, there are only a handful of studies that examine the role of corporate governance on a CEO’s opportunity costs to sell her holdings. In this paper, we provide evidence that quality of governance helps to explain a significant amount of variation in CEO ownership and the compensation structure. We argue that exogenous improvements in governance standards reduce the CEO’s costs to sell her shares because the market puts a higher weight on liquidity-related sales relative to private information-related sales. We find that CEO ownership level is strongly negatively related to the quality of corporate governance. Further, we argue that higher liquidation of shareholdings lowers the CEO’s wealth-performance sensitivity; hence, the compensation committee needs to give more incentive compensation to keep the wealth-performance sensitivity at the optimal level. We find that CEO incentive intensity is positively associated with the quality of corporate governance. Thus, we find that CEOs get more stakes in the firm, but CEOs choose to hold a lower stake in their portfolio. We use the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (henceforth, SOX) as a quasi-natural experiment to mitigate the causality concern between corporate governance, CEO’s stick ownership, and compensation structure. As a robustness test, we check that CEOs, under good governance, have higher yearly share sales. This effect is positively related to CEOs' tenure and negatively related to the size of the firm. However, we show that even if they earn higher incentive compensation, CEOs with lower stock ownership have lower wealth-performance sensitivity compared to CEOs with higher stock ownership. Our results have important implications for contracting mechanisms related to mitigating agency problems.

CEO Ownership and Valuation

CEO Ownership, External Governance, and Risk-taking

Political Connections, Founding Family Ownership and Leverage Decision of Privately Owned Firms

Political Capital Vs. Constraint: Evidence from CEO Turnovers in Chinese Private Firms

Quality of Governance, Opportunity Costs, and CEO Compensation Structure

Management ownership and corporate value

Performance Evaluation Mechanism and CEO Turnover——Evidence Based on Different Ultimate Ownership in China's Lasted Firms

Heterogeneity in the Effect of Managerial Equity Incentives on Firm Value

Political Capital and CEO Entrenchment: Evidence from CEO Turnover in Chinese Non-Soes

Reexamining the managerial ownership effect on firm value

Large Shareholdings and Firm Value:An Empirical Analysis

High CEO Pay Ratios: Governance Failure or Superior Performance?

The Relationship Between Governance Mechanisms, Managerial Behaviors and Firm Performance

Effect of CEO Overconfidence Tendency on ESG Evaluation Information

The relationship between managerial ownership and firm performance in high R&D firms

Large Shareholdings and Firm Value: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

Unintended Consequences of the Independent Board Requirement on CEO Power

State Common Ownership and Bank Governance: Evidence from CEO Turnovers in China

Structural models and endogeneity in corporate finance: The link between managerial ownership and corporate performance

CEO Power, Disclosure Quality and the Variability of Firm Performance

Determinants of Management Ownership of Unrestricted Equity: Overconfidence Versus Tax Explanations