The Effect of Various Electrodes on the Properties of Electroluminescent Devices with Potassium Chloride Inside Tris (8-Hydroxyquinoline) Aluminum
Zhaoyue Lue,Zhenbo Deng,Zheng Chen,Yuehong Yin,Denghui Xu,Jing Xiao,Yongsheng Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2011.01.004
IF: 3.074
2011-01-01
Displays
Abstract:The performance of organic light-emitting diodes (OLED), based on NPB/Alq(3)/KCl/Alq(3) active regions, with various anode (i.e. ITO and ITO/MoO3) and cathode (i.e. Al and LiF/AI) structures is compared. NPB, Alq(3), KCl, ITO, MoO3, Al and LiF are N,N'-bis-(1-naphthl)-diphenyl-1,1'-biphenyl-4,4'-diamine, tris (8-hydroxyquinoline) aluminum, potassium chloride, indium-tin oxide, molybdenum trioxide, aluminum and lithium fluoride, respectively. When bare AI is used as a cathode, both luminance and efficiency are improved by the insertion of KCl inside Alq(3) (anode/NPB/Alq(3)/KCl/Alq(3)/Al), compared to a control device (anode/NPB/Alq(3)/Al). This is attributed to trap sites induced by KCl layer, which give a better recombination in the devices. However, if the cathode is LiF/AI, the performance of control device (anode/NPB/Alq3/LiF/Al) is superior to that of devices with KCl inside Alq(3) (anode/NPB/Alq(3)/KCl/Alq(3)/LiF/Al), which is attributed that the probability of electron injection from cathode is decreased. (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier B.V.