Abstract:High-quality implementation of cross-border mergers and acquisitions (cross-border M&As) is an important pathway for emerging-market multinational enterprises (EMNEs) to enhance their international competitiveness. However, in comparison to developed countries, cross-border M&As by EMNEs are often prohibited by the liability of origin caused by negative political coverage. How and why negative political coverage affect the completion of cross-border M&As by EMNEs? What are the contextual constraints that moderate the impact of negative political coverage on cross-border M&As completion? Based on the “liability of origin” theory, this paper addresses these questions using data from the Zephyr database on cross-border M&As by EMNEs in the United States from 2016 to June 2021 and employing a logit model for estimation. The research findings are as follows: (1) Negative political coverage leads to negative perceptions of emerging market countries by host country stakeholders, creating the liability of origin and stigmatizing the corporate nationality, thereby reducing the success rate of cross-border M&As by EMNEs. (2) Increasing geographical distance leads to information asymmetry, reinforcing the negative impact of negative political coverage on the completion of cross-border M&As by EMNEs. (3) Relevant mergers and acquisitions exacerbate the negative effect of negative political coverage on the success rate of cross-border M&As by EMNEs. (4) Being a publicly traded firm and having successful experience in cross-border M&As both intensify the negative impact of negative political coverage on the success rate of cross-border M&As by EMNEs.

Managing political risk in cross-national investment: A stakeholder view

How Do Foreign SMEs Mitigate Violent Conflict Risk by Doing Good? an Instrumental Stakeholder Theory Perspective

POLITICAL RISKS OF OVERSEAS INVESTMENT FOR CHINESE ENTERPRISES AND ITS QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT MODEL

Geopolitical risk and foreign subsidiary performance of emerging market multinationals

Political Risks and Controls of Oversea Investment by Chinese Enterprises:Based on the Countries Along“one Belt One Road”

Political Risk of Chinese Company's Overseas Investment and Its Preventing Methods

Caught in the Deglobalisation Crosswind? De-risking by “china+1” or “In-China-for-china”

Does negative political coverage affect the completion of cross-border mergers and acquisitions—Evidence from BRICS in the US market

Global geopolitical risk and corporate ESG performance

Political Hazards and Entry Modes of Chinese Investments in Africa

Geopolitical Risk and Ownership Decision in Green Overseas Investment: Dual Moderation of Corporate Green Technology Capability and Host Green Governance

American Economic Stakeholder Sentiments towards Chinese Firms' Innovation Capability: The Role of State Political Environment and Firm Ownership

How geopolitical risk affect firms' internationalization performance: Evidence from China

Does Politician Turnover Affect Foreign Subsidiary Performance? Evidence in China

Is It Possible to Escape? Local Protectionism and Outward Foreign Direct Investment by Chinese Privately-Owned Enterprises

The Effectiveness of Corporate Political Strategies in Transition Economies

Geopolitical Risk and Corporate ESG Performance: Evidence from China

The impact of organizational stigmatization on the operational risk and performance of overseas subsidiaries: empirical evidence from Chinese multinational enterprises

Geopolitical risk and green outward foreign direct investment location choice: evidence from Chinese listed companies

Evaluation and Management of Political Risks in China'S Bot Projects

Does geopolitical risk affect firms' idiosyncratic volatility? Evidence from China