Abstract:PurposeThis paper aims to study how state ownership influences the innovation process in terms of allocating resources toward searching for new solutions and converting these efforts into economic value. On one hand, deep pockets of the state provide slack resources that may facilitate risk taking and innovation. On the other hand, soft budgets can create incentive problems and dampen the efficient use of resources. The authors suggest how accounting for competitive context can disentangle these countervailing forces.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use a panel of over 240,000 Chinese firms over the years 2004–2008. The broad sample and period afforded substantial variability in terms of state ownership within and across firms. The authors use a two-stage model and a within-firm (i.e. fixed-effects) design, controlling for all time-invariant firm characteristics and the problematic unobserved heterogeneity that can often lead to erroneous inferences. Furthermore, the relatively short window limits the likelihood of time-varying unobserved firm characteristics biasing the empirical results.FindingsThe authors found that private-sector competition has the opposite effect on the relationship between state ownership and the second step of the innovation process. In industries where there is robust private-sector competition, state ownership diminishes the firm’s ability to convert R&D efforts into economic value. Private-sector competition competes away any advantages state-owned firms may have in terms of developing or accessing the complementary resources needed for commercialization. Ultimately, the inefficiencies of state ownership in terms of relatively undisciplined selection and monitoring of R&D activities outweigh any potential resource advantages derived from state ownership.Originality/valueThe state remains a prominent player in many economies throughout the world. The authors explored how state ownership of firms influences the resources they expend in searching out new solutions, and their success in converting such resources into economically valuable new products and services. State ownership has potentially countervailing effects on innovation. The authors disentangle these countervailing effects through consideration of how accounting for competitive context could determine whether the beneficial effects of state ownership dominate its detrimental effects for both searching for new solutions and converting these efforts into economically valuable new products. With a focus of market competition as an external force that drives the difference in innovation between SOEs and the private-sector, this study serves as a parallel effort to Jiaet al.(2019) who investigate the joint effect of public and corporate governance on SOEs’ innovation performance, and Zhouet al.(2017) who concern the balance of the institution and efficiency logics on the comparative advantage of SOEs over privately owned enterprises in innovation performance.

American Economic Stakeholder Sentiments towards Chinese Firms' Innovation Capability: The Role of State Political Environment and Firm Ownership

The Effects of Corporate Governance on Innovation in Chinese Firms ∗

State capital involvement, managerial sentiment and firm innovation performance Evidence from China

Political Connections As an Impediment to Chinese Firms’ Innovation? A Motivation–Opportunity–Ability Perspective

State Ownership, Firm Innovation and the Moderating Role of Private-Sector Competition: the Case of China

The Effect of ESG Performance on Corporate Innovation in China: The Mediating Role of Financial Constraints and Agency Cost

How much state ownership is more conducive to corporate innovation in firms? Evidence from China

Green Investor Holdings and Corporate Green Technological Innovation

Untangling the Duality of Emerging Market Firms' Response to Outward Foreign Direct Investment Policies on Their Innovation Performance: A Resource Dependence Perspective

State Ownership and Firm Innovation in China: An Integrated View of Institutional and Efficiency Logics

Financial Constraints and Firm Innovative Performance: Evidence from Chinese Companies

Foreign investor engagement: Stock market liberalization and corporate green innovation in China

Do Political Ties Cause Over-Investment in Corporate Social Responsibility? Empirical Evidence from Chinese Private Firms

Local media sentiment towards pollution and its effect on corporate green innovation

Foreign Shareholders’ Social Responsibility, R&D Innovation, and International Competitiveness of Chinese SOEs

Large shareholder–manager social capital and firms’ radical innovation: empirical evidence from Chinese firms

Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Catering to Investor Sentiment in China

Does External Innovation Promote the Exports of Private Enterprises? A Market Stakeholder Perspective

Exploitation or Exploration? Managerial Myopia, Economic Policy Uncertainty and Ambidextrous Innovation Investment

The impact of U.S. monetary policy on Chinese firms' innovation

State Ownership and Corporate Innovation Efficiency