Abstract:This panel was convened at 10:45 am, Friday, April 5, by its moderator, Wenhua Shan of Xi'an Jiaotong University, who introduced the panelists: Chen Fuli of the Ministry of Commerce, Embassy of China; Chen Huiping of the School of Law, Xiamen University; Mark Feldman of Peking University School of Transnational Law; and Won Kidane of Seattle University School of Law. * * Chen Fuli did not submit remarks for the Proceedings. REFLECTIONS ON CHINA-AFRICA BITS By Won Kidane ([dagger]) BACKGROUND The rise in the last decade of Chinese investment in Africa (1) continues to be a subject of curiosity. (2) Traditionally, the bulk of foreign investment flew North-South but rarely SouthSouth. (3) This is changing as China becomes an important player as a sender of foreign direct investment (FDI). In the 21st century, international investment agreements (IIAs), particularly bilateral investment treaties (BITs), have become the principal means of protection of foreign investment. (4) These investment treaties themselves lie along a spectrum representing the balance of power of their own era. Much like U.S. BITs, China's BITs are said to have gone through at least three generational modifications. (5) China has employed all three generations to protect its investment in Africa. Do China's BITs tell a story of a nation's rapid transformation from a recipient of FDI to a sender of FDI? Or do they paint a more complicated picture? China's approach to investment in Africa appears to be different from the approaches that Africa's traditional partners from Europe and North America have taken over the years. A 2010 UNCTAD report describes such difference in the following terms: [I]n contrast to Africa's relationship with traditional partners, the new partnerships ... often have established forums and dialogue platforms and are generally supported by frequent high-level official visits. Furthermore, they are based on the principle of noninterference in the internal affairs of partner countries. Consequently, they are not associated with policy conditionality as has been the case in relations with traditional partners. (6) The report states further that "[the] big Southern partners [mainly China] generally use official flows to promote trade and investment activities in Africa. Furthermore, Southern partners do not consider their financial contributions to other developing countries as aid. Rather they describe them as 'expressions of solidarity and cooperation borne out of shared experiences and sympathies.'" (7) Although the role of China's involvement in Africa remains a subject of great controversy and heated debate, (8) it is clear that Africa's recent and unprecedented growth is not entirely unrelated to Chinese investment and trade. (9) Be that as it may, China's economic interest in Africa is not all that different from Africa's traditional partners. Its means of pursuing the economic goals are also similar--although as Ambassador David Shinn puts it--China employs different tactics that might make it more acceptable to Africa. In his own words: [T]he United States and China use essentially the same political economic, military and cultural tools for implementing their relations with Africa. The emphasis the two sides place on these tactics, however, and the way they implement policy varies considerably. China presents itself more humbly in its interaction with Africa. Having served as the leader of the Western world since the end of the Second World War and the only superpower since the end of the Cold War, the United States often comes across in Africa as insensitive ... (10) The current China-Africa economic engagement is undoubtedly full of benefits and risks (11) arguably to both sides. The legal infrastructure for the management of such risks is in a state of development. …

Political Hazards and Entry Modes of Chinese Investments in Africa

Factors Analysis about FDI Scale and Entry Modes in China

International Experience and FDI Location Choices of Chinese Firms: the Moderating Effects of Home Country Government Support and Host Country Institutions

Is It Possible to Escape? Local Protectionism and Outward Foreign Direct Investment by Chinese Privately-Owned Enterprises

The Research of the Influencing Factors of Chinese Enterprises' Direct Investment in Africa

How Would Legal Systems Affect US and Chinese Foreign Direct Investment in Africa? an Exploration of the Roles of Origins, Customary Law, and Legal Integration

How does home and host-country policy uncertainty affect outward FDI? Firm-level evidence from China

A Study on Spatio-Temporal Difference of Foreign Direct Investment in Africa

The impact of institutional quality on Chinese foreign direct investment in Africa

Spatio-Temporal Evolution of China's OFDI in Africa Countries and Its Influencing Factors

Political Risks and Controls of Oversea Investment by Chinese Enterprises:Based on the Countries Along“one Belt One Road”

Influence of political risk environment in neighboring countries on FDI in host countries: the moderating role of green governance in neighboring countries

Foreign Direct Investment in Africa: The Role of Natural Resources, Market Size, Government Policy, Institutions and Political Instability

The challenges of Internationalisation of Chinese companies in Africa: A systematic review

China-Africa Investment Treaties and Dispute Settlement: A Piece of the Multipolar Puzzle

Why Has China Invested Heavily in Countries with Weak Market Environments? A New Explanation and Implications for China-Africa Economic Cooperation

Domestic Political Unrest and Chinese Overseas Foreign Direct Investment

The Entry‐mode Decision of Chinese Outward FDI: Firm Resources, Industry Conditions, and Institutional Forces

POLITICAL RISKS OF OVERSEAS INVESTMENT FOR CHINESE ENTERPRISES AND ITS QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT MODEL

Mode Of Entry And The Regional Distribution Of Foreign Direct Investment In China

Going Global: Understanding China’s Outward Foreign Direct Investment from Motivational and Institutional Perspectives