Abstract:Abstract To evaluate the role of corneal hysteresis (CH) as a risk factor for progressive ONH surface depression and RNFL thinning measured by confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (CSLO) and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), respectively in glaucoma patients. Prospective study. A total of 146 eyes of 90 patients with glaucoma were recruited consecutively. The CH measurements were acquired at baseline and 4-months interval using the Ocular Response Analyzer (Reichert Instruments, Depew, NY). Eyes were imaged by CSLO (Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph [HRT]; Heidelberg Engineering, GmbH, Dossenheim, Germany) and SD-OCT (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Dublin, CA) at approximately 4-month intervals for measurement of ONH surface topography and RNFL thickness, respectively. Significant ONH surface depression and RNFL thinning were defined with reference to Topographic Change Analysis (TCA) with HRT and Guided Progression Analysis (GPA) with Cirrus HD-OCT, respectively. Multivariate cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate whether CH is a risk factor for ONH surface depression and RNFL progression after adjusting potential confounding factors. All patients with glaucoma were followed for an average of 6.76 years (range, 4.56–7.61 years). Sixty-five glaucomatous eyes (44.5%) of 49 patients showed ONH surface depression, 55 eyes (37.7%) of 43 patients had progressive RNFL thinning and 20 eyes (13.7%) of 17 patients had visual field progression. In the cox proportional hazards model, after adjusting baseline diastolic IOP, CCT, age, baseline disc area and baseline MD, baseline CH was significantly associated with ONH surface depression and visual field progression (HR = 0.71, P = 0.014 and HR = 0.54, P = 0.018, respectively), but not with RNFL thinning (HR = 1.03, P = 0.836). For each 1-mmHg decrease in baseline CH, the hazards for ONH surface depression increase by 29%, and the hazards for visual field progression increase by 46%. The CH measurements were significantly associated with risk of glaucoma progression. Eyes with a lower CH were significantly associated with an increased risk of ONH surface depression and visual field progression in glaucoma patients.

[The Measured Value of Corneal Hysteresis and Resistance Factor with Their Related Factors Analysis in Normal Eyes].

The analysis of corneal asphericity (Q value) and its related factors of 1,683 Chinese eyes older than 30 years

A compare study on cornea biomechanical properties in normal and keratoconic eyes

Corneal Biomechanics Determination in Healthy Myopic Subjects

Central Corneal Thickness and Corneal Hysteresis During Corneal Swelling Induced by Contact Lens Wear with Eye Closure

Corneal Hysteresis with Intraocular Pressure of A Wide Range: A Test on Porcine Eyes

Diurnal variation of ocular hysteresis, corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure.

The Influence of Pterygium on Corneal Biomechanical Properties

Comparison of corneal biomechanics in pre and post-refractive surgery and keratoconic eyes by Ocular Response Analyser

Relationship of corneal hysteresis and optic nerve parameters in healthy myopic subjects

Corneal hysteresis as a risk factor for optic nerve head surface depression and retinal nerve fiber layer thinning in glaucoma patients

Corneal biomechanical metrics of healthy Chinese adults using Corvis ST.

Variability of Corneal Deformation Response in Normal and Keratoconic Eyes

Correlation analysis between myopic refraction and ocular components

Clinical study on the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on early-stage orthokeratology

Corneal Asphericity of Myopic Eye and Relative Factors

Corneal thickness and its correlated factors in schoolchildren aged 6 to 18 years

Corneal Biomechanics Differences Between Chinese and Caucasian Healthy Subjects

Association Between Corneal Biomechanical Properties and Myopia in Chinese Subjects

Effect of Intraocular Pressure and Central Corneal Thickness on Corneal Spherical Aberration and Asphericity in Mild and Moderate Myopes

Changes in ocular response analyzer parameters after LASIK.