Accuracy of the WASCA aberrometer refraction compared to manifest refraction in astigmatism and its influencing factors

Xiangjia Zhu,Jinhui Dai,Renyuan Chu,Jicang He,Yi Lu,Xingtao Zhou,Lin Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2008.10.017
2008-01-01
Abstract:The aim of present study was to investigate the accuracy of WASCA aberrometer refraction compared to manifest refraction in astigmatism and analyze the possible influencing factors. Methods WASCA and manifest refraction was performed on 360 individuals with myopia and the data of right eyes was collected (group I). The cylindrical magnitude and axis differences between the two methods were compared. Forty-six subjects were randomly chosen from group I to study the correlation between those differences and C3 to C14 order Zernike coefficients (group II). According to the axis 45° and 135°, subjects in each group were divided into two subgroups; negative cylinder axis adjacent to 90° and 180° (group I 90, group I 180, group II 90 ,and group II 180). Results In group I, the mean difference of cylinder magnitude between WASCA(C A) and manifest refraction ( C S) was (0.06 ± 0.30) D (P < 0.01). The mean absolute value of difference of cylinder axis between the two methods(| A A - A s |) was (7.4 ± 9.7)°. In subjects whose cylinder magnitudes were less than -0.75 D, the mean A A - A s was larger(P < 0.01). In group II, through multiple linear regression analysis combined with stepwise regression, the final multiple regression equations were as follows: group II 180: C A - C s = 0.135 + 1.215 × C13;group II 90: C 4 - Cs = 0.153 -0.681 × C13 -0.386 × C7 + 0.790 × C10, |A A - A s | =1.986 + 13.043 × |C8|. Conclusion WASCA aberrometer is accurate in predicting cylinder magnitude but less effective for the measurement of axis in low astigmatism eyes. WASCA plays opposite effects on cylinder magnitude difference of secondary astigmatism in comparison with manifest refraction in the subjects with negative cylinder axes adjacent to 180° and 90°. The effects of higher-order aberrations on magnitude differences are more comprehensive in the eye with the negative cylinder axes adjacent to 90° , and magnitude of horizontal coma may affect the difference of axis in both two methods.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?