Abstract:The physical limits for methane storage and delivery in nanoporous materials were investigated, with a focus on whether it is possible to reach a methane deliverable capacity of 315 cm3(STP)/cm3 in line with the adsorption target established by the ARPA-E agency. Our efforts focused on how both geometric and chemical properties, such as void fraction (V f), volumetric surface area (S v), and heat of adsorption (Q st), impact methane deliverable capacity, i.e., the amount of methane adsorbed at some storage pressure minus the amount adsorbed at the delivery pressure. With the aid of grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations, we studied methane adsorption and delivery properties in a population of 122 835 hypothetical pcu metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) and 39 idealized carbon-based porous materials. From the simulation results, we developed an analytical equation that helped us delimit the necessary material properties to reach specific methane deliverable capacity targets. The maximum deliverable capacity between 65 and 5.8 bar among the hypothetical MOFs was 206 cm3(STP)/cm3 at 298 K. We found that artificially increasing the methane–MOF interaction strength by increasing the Lennard-Jones ε parameters of the MOF atoms by 2- and 4-fold only improved the maximum deliverable capacity up to 223 and 228 cm3(STP)/cm3, respectively. However, the effect on the amount stored at 65 bar was more significant, which suggested another strategy; raising the temperature of the system by 100 K can recover ∼70% of the methane stranded at the delivery pressure. By increasing the delivery temperature to 398 K, the ARPA-E target was reached by a few hypothetical MOFs with quadrupled ε values. This work shows the difficulty in reaching the ARPA-E target but also suggests that a strategy that combines a material with a large volumetric density of sites that interact strongly with methane and raising the delivery temperature can greatly improve the performance of nanoporous materials for methane storage and delivery. The optimal heat of adsorption in an isothermal storage and delivery scenario is approximately 10.5–14.5 kJ/mol, whereas in the nonisothermal storage and delivery scenario the optimal heats of adsorption fell within a range of 11.8–19.8 kJ/mol.

Methane Storage in Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes at the Quantity of 80 G

Hydrogen Storage in Multi-Wall Carbon Nanotubes Using Samples Up to 85 G

Kinetics of Methane Hydrate Formation in a 1200 Ml Unstirred Reactor for Natural Gas Storage

Enhanced methane hydrate formation in the highly dispersed carbon nanotubes-based nanofluid

High-Density Nanoporous carbon materials as storage material for Methane: A value-added solution

Studies of Multi-walled Carbon Nanotubes and Their Capabilities of Hydrogen Adsorption

Microporous MOF-5@AC and Cu-BDC@AC Composite Materials for Methane Storage in ANG Technology

Methane adsorption in nanoporous carbon: the numerical estimation of optimal storage conditions

Porous Metal-Organic Frameworks: Promising Materials for Methane Storage

Nanochannel Water in Molecular Porous Crystals for Methane Storage

Hydrate-based adsorption-hydration hybrid approach enhances methane storage in wet MIL-101(Cr)@AC under mild condition

Exploring the Limits of Methane Storage and Delivery in Nanoporous Materials

A multi-walled carbon nanotube/palladium nanocomposite prepared by a facile method for the detection of methane at room temperature

Pore Structure And Hydrogen Storage Of Carbon Nanotubes

Carbon nanofibers with gas selective layer containing rich and accessible ultramicropores for methane/nitrogen separation

CARBON NANOTUBES GROWING OVER NATURAL MINERALS AND PRELIMINARY STUDY ON THEIR CAPABILITY OF HYDROGEN STORAGE

Methane Gas Storage in Self-Ordered Mesoporous Carbon (CMK-3)

Molecular Dynamics Study on the Storage of Carbon Dioxide in Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes at Low Pressures

Adsorption and Diffusion of Carbon Dioxide, Methane, and Their Mixture in Carbon Nanotubes in the Presence of Water

High-Pressure Methane Storage in Porous Materials: Are Carbon Materials in the Pole Position?

Methane storage in zeolite-like carbon materials