Abstract:The physical limits for methane storage and delivery in nanoporous materials were investigated, with a focus on whether it is possible to reach a methane deliverable capacity of 315 cm3(STP)/cm3 in line with the adsorption target established by the ARPA-E agency. Our efforts focused on how both geometric and chemical properties, such as void fraction (V f), volumetric surface area (S v), and heat of adsorption (Q st), impact methane deliverable capacity, i.e., the amount of methane adsorbed at some storage pressure minus the amount adsorbed at the delivery pressure. With the aid of grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations, we studied methane adsorption and delivery properties in a population of 122 835 hypothetical pcu metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) and 39 idealized carbon-based porous materials. From the simulation results, we developed an analytical equation that helped us delimit the necessary material properties to reach specific methane deliverable capacity targets. The maximum deliverable capacity between 65 and 5.8 bar among the hypothetical MOFs was 206 cm3(STP)/cm3 at 298 K. We found that artificially increasing the methane–MOF interaction strength by increasing the Lennard-Jones ε parameters of the MOF atoms by 2- and 4-fold only improved the maximum deliverable capacity up to 223 and 228 cm3(STP)/cm3, respectively. However, the effect on the amount stored at 65 bar was more significant, which suggested another strategy; raising the temperature of the system by 100 K can recover ∼70% of the methane stranded at the delivery pressure. By increasing the delivery temperature to 398 K, the ARPA-E target was reached by a few hypothetical MOFs with quadrupled ε values. This work shows the difficulty in reaching the ARPA-E target but also suggests that a strategy that combines a material with a large volumetric density of sites that interact strongly with methane and raising the delivery temperature can greatly improve the performance of nanoporous materials for methane storage and delivery. The optimal heat of adsorption in an isothermal storage and delivery scenario is approximately 10.5–14.5 kJ/mol, whereas in the nonisothermal storage and delivery scenario the optimal heats of adsorption fell within a range of 11.8–19.8 kJ/mol.

Porous Metal-Organic Frameworks: Promising Materials for Methane Storage

Methane Storage on Metal-Organic Frameworks

A Metal–Organic Framework with Optimized Porosity and Functional Sites for High Gravimetric and Volumetric Methane Storage Working Capacities

Porous Metal-Organic Polyhedral Frameworks with Optimal Molecular Dynamics and Pore Geometry for Methane Storage

Exploring the Limits of Methane Storage and Delivery in Nanoporous Materials

A Metal–Organic Framework with Optimized Open Metal Sites and Pore Spaces for High Methane Storage at Room Temperature

High-Pressure Methane Storage in Porous Materials: Are Carbon Materials in the Pole Position?

A Porous Metal–organic Framework with an Elongated Anthracene Derivative Exhibiting a High Working Capacity for the Storage of Methane

Methane Storage and Purification of Natural Gas in Metal‐Organic Frameworks

Porous MOFs with geometric mismatch between trimers and octatopic pyrene-based ligands for low-temperature methane storage

Porous metal–organic frameworks for methane storage and capture: status and challenges

Methane storage in metal-organic frameworks.

Modulated Hydrothermal Synthesis of Highly Stable MOF-808(Hf) for Methane Storage

Development of a Mixed Multinuclear Cluster Strategy in Metal-Organic Frameworks for Methane Purification and Storage

A Fluorinated Metal–Organic Framework for High Methane Storage at Room Temperature

Designed Metal-Organic Frameworks Based on MOF-5 and Their Methane Adsorption Calculation by Grand Canonical Monte Carlo Method

Ultrahigh–surface area covalent organic frameworks for methane adsorption

Tailoring the Pore Geometry and Chemistry in Microporous Metal-Organic Frameworks for High Methane Storage Working Capacity

Methane storage in flexible and dynamical metal–organic frameworks

A Microporous Metal-Organic Framework with Polarized Trifluoromethyl Groups for High Methane Storage.

Tuning porosity in macroscopic monolithic metal-organic frameworks for exceptional natural gas storage