Efficacy and specificity of laser acupuncture on the treatment of knee osteoarthritis

Ming-jian Xi,Ling Zhao,Xue-yong Shen,Guang-hong Ding,Jian-ping Gao,Li-zhen Wang,Ke Cheng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2008.26.021

2008-01-01

Abstract:Background: Infrared light or near infrared light mainly serves as light source of laser acupuncture and moxibustion. It can penetrate biotic tissues with no heat effect. Objective: To explore the efficacy on 650 nm and 10.6 μ m laser irradiation combined acupuncture for treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Design, time and setting: The randomized, single-blinded comparative observation was performed at Shuguang Hospital of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from November 2005 to June 2006. Participants: Forty patients with osteoarthritis of the knee were selected from Shuguang Hospital of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine and randomly divided into acupoint irradiation group (n=20), and non-acupoint irradiation group (control group, n=20). Methods: They either received 650 nm semiconductor and 10.6 μ m CO2 laser irradiation at Dubi acupoint (ST35) or at the control point (capitulum fibulae). Main outcome measures: The outcome was assessed using the scores of symptom and physical sign of knee osteoarthritis; the curative effects of two irradiation methods were compared and the dropout rate of both groups and drug use during the treatment were analyzed. Results: Of the 40 patients, 36 completed 6 sessions of treatment for weeks, and 31 completed 12 sessions for 4 weeks. Because the dropout rate of the control point group was more than 20% after 6 sessions of treatment, only the pre- and post-treatment scores of symptom and physical sign of patients who completed the first 6 sessions were analyzed. The acupoint irradiation of 2 weeks reduced the scores of symptom and physical sign by 24.88%, which showed significant differences than before treatment (P < 0.001). The group of irradiation at non-acupoint reduced the score of symptom and physical sign by 14.32%, which also showed significant differences (P < 0.05). No pre- or post-treatment differences were found between two groups in the scores of symptom and physical sign (P=0.909 and P=0.541). There were no statistical differences in dropout rate at the second treatment course, medication and evaluation after treatment between two groups (P=0.195). Conclusion: Laser irradiation at Dubi acupoint seems significantly beneficial to patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. However, due to the small sample size and high dropout rate of patients in the control group, the specific effect of Dubi acupoint should be further examined.