Abstract:To quantitatively compare the aperture-based and beamlet-based inverse planning techniques and draw conclusion with regard to the dependence of plan quality on the number of segments of the incident fields using three clinical cases of different disease sites. We developed a combined aperture based inverse planning algorithm. After the number of segments was specified, the beam eyes views (BEVs) are applied to delineate the maximum MLC field boundary for each gantry angle. The BEV apertures were chosen to be the initial settings of aperture shapes and served as physical constraints of aperture settings. In the proposed algorithm, we utilized the fast adaptive simulated annealing (ASA) technique to select the field shapes defined by the MLC leaf coordinates. A descent gradient-based optimization technique was employed to search for the optimal aperture weights under the guidance of a conventional quadratic objective function. By combing the fast ASA with the descent gradient search algorithm, the computational efficiency was consistently improved. The beamlet-based inverse planning used the same objective function and the descent gradient-based optimization. Beamlet-based optimization with 1cm × 1cm size was used to obtain the optimized fluence maps (10 intensity levels). Three clinical cases (prostate, thoracic, and head and neck) were selected for the comparative study. For each case, the gantry angles are chosen manually and beamlet-based inverse planning was performed. Aperture based optimization was done with the same beam configuration and beam modality. A range of number of segments (5 to 25) was investigated. Plans with different number of segments were evaluated based on the DVH and dose distribution improvements and the treatment times involved. The combined aperture-based inverse planning algorithm was implemented and tested by comparing with conventional simulated annealing algorithm for aperture-based IMRT. The same quality plans were achieved but the computation time was reduced even by an order of magnitude. The improvement in performance directly was directly resulted from the fact that the objective function is well behaved analytical function with respect to beam weights. The key results found from the comparative study are that the dose distribution and DVHs were improved with the increase of the number of segments. When the number is increased up to ∼14, the dose distribution obtained from aperture based optimization is quite similar to that of the beamlet-based optimization provided the leaves can be adjusted in 0.2cm increments in the aperture-based inverse planning. Further increase of the segment number only lead to minor improvement in dose distributions with much increased computing time. Considering the tradeoff between the plan quality and planning time, it seems that the optimal number of segment is between 10 ∼ 20. Aperture-based inverse planning seems to be a viable option for IMRT and eliminating the step of leaf sequencing. For a few different disease sites, our study indicate that the technique can produce IMRT plans comparable with that of beamlet-based inverse planning when the number of segments per fields is above ∼10. The improvement saturates gradually as the number of segments increased to above ∼20.

Comparison of different regines of inverse intensity modulated radiotherapy of post-operative patients with breast carcinoma

A dosimetric comparison of the tangential beams IMRT with multifield beams IMRT of the chest wall in postmastectomy breast cancer recurrent patients

Analysis of Dosimetric Results of Postoperative Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Using Single-Energy or Mixed-Energy Photons in Invasive Thymoma Patients

Volumetric and Dosimetric Variations in Radiation Treatment Planning Using CT Images Based on Different Reconstructed Field-of-view

Quantitative Comparison of Aperture-Based and Beamlet-Based Inverse Planning Techniques

Dosimetric study of tangential and multi-fields applied in the dynamic intensity modulated radiotherapy plans for breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery

[Dosimetric Evaluation of Intensity-Modulated Tangential Beam Versus Conventional Tangential Irradiation for Breast Cancer].

Dosimetrical Optimization Study of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Intact Breast

Companison of Dose Distribution and Setup Error of Two Different Positions and Immobilization Techniques in Breast Cancer Radiotherapy

A Comparison of Doses for Conventional Radiotherapy and Intensity Modulation Radiation Therapy after Breast-Conserving Operation

Comparative study of coplanar and non-coplanar intensity-modulated radiotherapy in advanced lung cancer

Dosimetric comparison of cardiac and pulmonary dose-volume between two radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery in breast cancer

A Dosimetric Study of Supine and Prone Treatment Setups for Breast Cancer Patients after Breast Conserving Surgery

Dosimetric Comparison Between Three Radiotherapy Regimens Involving Supraclavicular and Infraclavicular Regions in Breast Cancer Patients after Breast-Conserving Surgery

Dose distributions and lung doses of interstitial irradiation therapy and intensity-modulated radiotheray for thoracic neoplasms: a domestric comparison

Patients with breast cancer in post-mastectomy radiotherapy employed with heart faced radiation beam:dosimetric risk and benefits analysis

Dosimetric Comparison of Postmastectomy Radiotherapy Plans for Synchronous Bilateral Breast Cancer, Including Regional Lymph Node Irradiation

Comparison of dosimetry between three-dimension conformal and intensity modulated plan in postoperative radiotherapy for gastric cancer

Comparison of dosimetry distribution between three-dimension conformal and intensity modulated plan integrated with breath motion in postoperative radiation of gastric cancer

Influence on Dose Distribution by Beam Direction and Beam Number in Inverse Intensity-Modulated for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Postoperative radiotherapy following mastectomy for patients with left-sided breast cancer: A comparative dosimetric study