Abstract:The deleterious effects of anesthetic agents in patients suffering from coronary artery disease are well known. The risk increases when a patient has compromised ventricular function. There is a paucity of literature regarding the choice of the suitable agent to avoid deleterious effects in such patients. The use of etomidate and propofol has been considered superior to other intravenous anesthetic agents in these groups of patients. The aim of the present study is to compare the hemodynamic effects of anesthesia induction with etomidate, thiopentone, propofol, and midazolam in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. This randomized clinical trail was conducted at the All Indian Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. Sixty patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction < 45%) scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass surgery participated in this study. After stabilization baseline hemodynamic data stroke volume variation and systemic vascular resistance index were recorded for all patients (Flo Trac TM sensor with Vigileo cardiac output monitor used for hemodynamic monitoring). The patients were randomly alloted to one of the four groups and the intravenous induction agent was administered for over 60-90 seconds (Group E--Etomidate 0.2 mg/Kg; Group M--Midazolam 0.15 mg/Kg; Group T--Thiopentone 5 mg/Kg; Group P--Propofol 1.5 mg/Kg). Hemodynamic data were recorded at one minute intervals starting from induction till seven minutes after intubation,--the end point of the present study. There was a significant decrease in the heart rate in comparison to the baseline(-7 to -15%, P = 0.001), mean arterial pressure (-27 to -32%, P = 0.001), cardiac index (-36 to -38%, P = 0.001), and stroke volume index (-27 to -34%, P = 0.001) after induction in all four groups. The hemodynamic response was similar in all the four groups. There was no significant change in central venous pressure and stroke volume variation (SVV) during induction and intubation, while the effects on the systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) were variable. The midazolam group was the most effective in preventing intubation stress (tachycardia,hypertension). The change from baseline values in heart rate (+ 4%, P = 0.12) and mean arterial pressure (-1%, P = 0.77) after intubation were not statistically significant in the midazolam group. The etomidate group was the least effective of all the four groups in minimizing stress response, with statistically significant increase from baseline in both heart rate (P = 0.001) and mean arterial pressure (P = 0.001) at 1 minute after intubation. All the four anesthetic agents were acceptable for induction in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction despite a 30-40% decrease in the cardiac index. Clinician experience along with knowledge of the potential interactions (e.g., premedication, concurrent opioid use) is needed to determine hemodynamic stability during anesthetic induction in these patients with ventricular dysfunction.

Anesthesia Induction for the Patients with the Severe Mitral Stenosis

Effect of Remimazolam Tosilate Versus Etomidate on Hemodynamics in Patients Undergoing Valve Replacement Surgery: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of Midazolam and Propofol on Cytokine Balance in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Valve Replacement

Protective Effects of Midazolam and Propofol on Myocardial Stunning in Patients Undergoing Open Heart Surgery

Anesthesia of Valvular Substitution for Patients with Huge Left Ventricle

[Comparative hemodynamic study of anesthesia induction with propofol (Diprivan), thiopental, methohexital, etomidate and midazolam in patients with coronary disease]

Comparison of sufentanil-oxygen and fentanyl-oxygen anesthesia for mitral and aortic valvular surgery

Effect of etomidate with sufentanil and sevoflurane on hemodynamics in infants with congenital heart disease shunting from left to right

A randomized trial of anesthetic induction agents in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction

Propofol/fentanyl versus etomidate/fentanyl for the induction of anesthesia in patients with aortic insufficiency and coronary artery disease

Anesthesia for Aortic Valve Insufficiency Complicated with Extremely Dilated Left Ventvicle

Effect of etomidate and propofol induction on hemodynamic and endocrine response in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting/mitral valve and aortic valve replacement surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass

[ST segment changes in the ECG. Anesthesia induction with propofol, etomidate or midazolam in patients with coronary heart disease]

Hemodynamic Responses to Two Different Anesthesia Regimens in Compromised Left Ventricular Function Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Etomidate-Midazolam Versus Propofol-Ketamine

Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Cardiovascular Responses During Anesthetic Induction in Hypertensive Patients

Effect of three opioids used as induction agent in general anesthesia on intubation reaction of senile patients

Influences of Calmness of Consciousness in Patients Undergoing Coronary Intervention on Haemodynamics

Changes of hemodynamics during induction of intravenous anesthesia in children with ventricular septal defect

Variation of hemodynamic response following induction and tracheal intubation: etomidate vs midazolam

Application of oxycodone hydrochloride in the induction of general anesthesia

The Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on Hemodynamic Response to Endotracheal Intubation During Sufentanil-Based Induction of Anaesthesia