Abstract:Background: The ideal depth of general anesthesia should achieve the required levels of hypnosis, analgesia, and muscle relaxation while minimizing physiologic responses to awareness. The choice of anesthetic strategy in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) undergoing major noncardiac surgery is becoming an increasingly important issue as the population ages. This is because general anesthesia is associated with a risk of perioperative cardiac complications and death, and this risk is much higher in people with CHD. Aim: To compare hemodynamic function and cardiovascular event rate between etomidate- and propofol-based anesthesia in patients with CHD. Methods: This prospective study enrolled consecutive patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists grade II/III) with stable CHD (New York Heart Association class I/II) undergoing major noncardiac surgery. The patients were randomly allocated to receive either etomidate/remifentanil-based or propofol/remifentanil-based general anesthesia. Randomization was performed using a computer-generated random number table and sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. Concealment was maintained until the patient had arrived in the operating theater, at which point the consulting anesthetist opened the envelope. All patients, data collectors, and data analyzers were blinded to the type of anesthesia used. The primary endpoints were the occurrence of cardiovascular events (bradycardia, tachycardia, hypotension, ST-T segment changes, and ventricular premature beats) during anesthesia and cardiac troponin I level at 24 h. The secondary endpoints were hemodynamic parameters, bispectral index, and use of vasopressors during anesthesia. Results: The final analysis included 40 patients in each of the propofol and etomidate groups. The incidences of bradycardia, hypotension, ST-T segment changes, and ventricular premature beats during anesthesia were significantly higher in the propofol group than in the etomidate group (P < 0.05 for all). The incidence of tachycardia was similar between the two groups. Cardiac troponin I levels were comparable between the two groups both before the induction of anesthesia and at 24 h after surgery. When compared with the etomidate group, the propofol group had significantly lower heart rates at 3 min after the anesthetic was injected (T1) and immediately after tracheal intubation (T2), lower systolic blood pressure at T1, and lower diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure at T1, T2, 3 min after tracheal intubation, and 5 min after tracheal intubation (P < 0.05 for all). Vasopressor use was significantly more in the propofol group than in the etomidate group during the induction and maintenance periods (P < 0.001). Conclusion: In patients with CHD undergoing noncardiac major surgery, etomidate-based anesthesia is associated with fewer cardiovascular events and smaller hemodynamic changes than propofol-based anesthesia.

Protective Effects of Midazolam and Propofol on Myocardial Stunning in Patients Undergoing Open Heart Surgery

Effect of Midazolam and Propofol on Cytokine Balance in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Valve Replacement

Effect of Remimazolam Tosilate Versus Etomidate on Hemodynamics in Patients Undergoing Valve Replacement Surgery: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

The Protective Effect of Aminophylline on Myocardium During Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Effect of Ketamine on Activities of Phosphodiestrases in Open Heart Surgery

Protective effects of propofol and isoflurane on cerebral oxygen me tabolism and cerebral injury during cardiopulmonary bypass:A comparative study

Comparison of the Effects of Etomidate Versus Propofol on Cerebral Oxygen Metabolism in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery

Hemodynamic Responses to Two Different Anesthesia Regimens in Compromised Left Ventricular Function Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Etomidate-Midazolam Versus Propofol-Ketamine

Etomidate vs propofol in coronary heart disease patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery: A randomized clinical trial

Postconditioning of Sevoflurane and Propofol is Associated with Mitochondrial Permeability Transition Pore

Effect of Desflurane Precondition on the Adhension Molecules and Lipid Peroxidation after CPB Early

Effects of Sevoflurane Preconditioning and Postconditioning on Rat Myocardial Stunning in Ischemic Reperfusion Injury

[Hemodynamic action profile of propofol in comparison with midazolam. A study in coronary surgical patients]

Effect of Volatile Versus Propofol Anaesthesia on Major Complications and Mortality after Cardiac Surgery: a Multicentre Randomised Trial

Comparison Between the Protective Effect of Isoflurane and Propofol on Myocardium During Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Effect of Midazolam Pretreatment on Propofol Sedation by Closed-Loop TCI During Epidural Anesthesia

Comparing the impact on the prognosis of acute myocardial infarction critical patients of using midazolam, propofol, and dexmedetomidine for sedation

[Comparative hemodynamic study of anesthesia induction with propofol (Diprivan), thiopental, methohexital, etomidate and midazolam in patients with coronary disease]

Effect of Propofol on Lung Protection in Patients Undergoing Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Influences of Calmness of Consciousness in Patients Undergoing Coronary Intervention on Haemodynamics

Effect of etomidate and propofol induction on hemodynamic and endocrine response in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting/mitral valve and aortic valve replacement surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass