Simultaneous removal of SO2 and NOx by a corona radical shower system

Xiang Gao,Zuliang Wu,Zhongyang Luo,Mingjiang Ni,Kefa Cen
2005-01-01
Abstract:Non-Thermal plasma could be one of the most effective methods for multi-pollutants removal from coal-fired boilers or waste incinerators. In this paper, a promising non-Thermal plasma system, corona discharge radical shower system (CDRS), is proposed for simultaneous SO2 and NOx removal. A systematic investigation in laboratory scale for reducing SO2 and NOx has been done. The reactive competition between SO2 and NOx, removal rate and energy efficiency were deeply studied. In addition, removal byproducts were analyzed through X diffraction equipment. Experimental results show that stable and intense streamer corona can be formed and strong pulse current, about 20 kHz, is produced on present experimental conditions. Adding SO2 can promote NOx removal but excessive SO2 has negative function on NOx removal. The best SO2 concentration is about 80 ppm. Adding NO hasn't evident effect on SO2 removal. On the contrary, the SO 2 removal rate has little reduction with the higher NO initial concentration. With the increasing [NH3]/[NO]+[SO2] molecular ratio (MR), SO2 removal rate can improve rapidly without no corona discharge. With corona discharge, SO2 removal rate can increase further. NOx removal is affected by MR. Its removal is mainly dependent on corona discharge. In oxidative ambience, major NO is converted into NO2, which leads NOx removal rate not to be high, about 40%. With the increasing discharge power, SO2 and NOx energy yields decrease rapidly. However, SO2 and NOx removal rates increases with the increasing discharge power. Therefore, in order to attain higher energy yield and removal rate simultaneously, the input power must be adjusted according to the actual conditions. After experiment has been gone on for some hours, some white crystalloid substance can be seen in the inner wall of reactor. Through X diffraction, it is mainly composed of (NH4)2SO2 and NH4NO 3. © (2005) by the International Pittsburgh Coal Conference.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?