A Contribution to the Stability of Nonholonomic Systems
HP Zhu,AB Yu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0093-6413(02)00268-9
IF: 2.749
2002-01-01
Mechanics Research Communications
Abstract:Nonholonomic systems, i.e., the mechanical systems subject to constraints that are often expressed in terms of nonintegrable linear velocity relationships, are remarkably rich. There are numerous examples of such systems, many of substantial engineering interest. The most popular example appears in the motion of a rigid body rolling on a plane without sliding (Neimark and Fufaev, 1972; Mei, 1985). There are many publications dealing with the dynamics of nonholonomic systems. The stability of nonholonomic systems has been recognised as an important aspect of the studies (Neimark and Fufaev, 1972; Mei, 1985; Krasinskii, 1988; Karapetyan and Rumyantsev, 1990; Mei, 1992; Zhu and Mei, 1994; Furta, 1991; Karapetian, 1975; Rumianstev, 1967; Aiserman and Gantmacher, 1957; Karapetian, 1981) since the pioneer work of Whittaker (1904). The closed equations of motion of nonholonomic systems must include the equations of constraint. This is a characteristic feature of nonholonomic systems. The nonholonomic constraints imposed on the motion of such a system lead to the following two well known features different from those of holonomic systems. One is that the equilibrium positions of a nonholonomic system are not isolated, and the set of all the equilibrium positions is a manifold having dimensions not less than the number of the nonholonomic constraints. The manifold is called as the manifold of equilibria by some investigators (Karapetyan and Rumyantsev, 1990). This feature has in the past led to two main research focuses: the stability of the manifold of equilibria (Neimark and Fufaev, 1972; Mei, 1985; Karapetyan and Rumyantsev, 1990; Karapetian, 1975) and the stability of single equilibrium position in the manifold (Neimark and Fufaev, 1972; Mei, 1985; Krasinskii, 1988; Karapetyan and Rumyantsev, 1990; Mei, 1992; Zhu and Mei, 1994; Rumianstev, 1967; Aiserman and Gantmacher, 1957; Whittaker, 1904). Another feature is that the characteristic equations of the first approximation of the equations of motion have zero roots whose number at least equals that of nonholonomic constraints. The two features make the stability of nonholonomic systems very complicated and an active challenging research area as well. Mechanics Research Communications 29 (2002) 307–314 www.elsevier.com/locate/mechrescom MECHANICS