Abstract:The constraint distribution in non-holonomic mechanics has a double role. On one hand, it is a kinematic constraint, that is, it is a restriction on the motion itself. On the other hand, it is also a restriction on the allowed variations when using D'Alembert's Principle to derive the equations of motion. We will show that many systems of physical interest where D'Alembert's Principle does not apply can be conveniently modeled within the general idea of the Principle of Virtual Work by the introduction of both kinematic constraints and variational constraints as being independent entities. This includes, for example, elastic rolling bodies and pneumatic tires. Also, D'Alembert's Principle and Chetaev's Principle fall into this scheme. We emphasize the geometric point of view, avoiding the use of local coordinates, which is the appropriate setting for dealing with questions of global nature, like reduction.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: how to process and model a class of non - holonomic constraint systems, especially those systems where D'Alembert's principle is not applicable. Specifically, the authors focus on systems with high - order non - holonomic constraints, such as elastic rolling bodies and pneumatic tires, etc. The dynamic behaviors of these systems cannot be simply described by the classical variational principle.
### Main problems
1. **Limitations of D'Alembert's principle**:
- D'Alembert's principle is not applicable in some physical systems, especially when the system contains complex constraint conditions, such as elastic rolling bodies and pneumatic tires.
- The paper points out that the dynamic behaviors of many actual physical systems (such as elastic rolling bodies) cannot be described by D'Alembert's principle, even in the case of linear constraints.
2. **Introduction of higher - order constraints**:
- In order to better describe the dynamic behaviors of these systems, the authors propose a generalized Chetaev's principle, which can handle nonlinear and higher - order constraint conditions.
- These higher - order constraints are not limited to velocity constraints, but also include constraints on higher - order derivatives.
3. **Distinguishing between kinematic constraints and variational constraints**:
- The authors emphasize the difference between kinematic constraints and variational constraints and regard them as independent entities.
- This distinction is crucial for dealing with non - holonomic systems, especially in cases where D'Alembert's principle is not applicable.
4. **Application of geometric methods**:
- The paper adopts geometric methods to deal with these problems, avoiding the use of local coordinate systems, and is thus more suitable for dealing with problems of global nature, such as reduction theory.
### Specific examples
- **Elastic rolling ball**:
- The authors show how to use different constraint types (including second - order nonlinear constraints) to describe the dynamic behavior of the system through a simple example - an elastic uniformly rolling ball.
- This example shows that even in the presence of linear constraints, it is not necessarily necessary to use D'Alembert's principle.
- **Rocard's pneumatic tire theory**:
- The authors also discuss Rocard's pneumatic tire theory, which involves more complex constraint conditions, such as small - angle offsets in the contact area.
- This example shows the practical application of how to deal with nonlinear and higher - order constraint conditions.
### Summary
The main purpose of this paper is to establish a general framework for processing and modeling systems with high - order non - holonomic constraints, especially those systems where D'Alembert's principle is not applicable. By introducing higher - order constraints and distinguishing between kinematic constraints and variational constraints, the authors provide a new method to describe the dynamic behaviors of these complex systems.