Performance Impact of Manufacturing Variations for Multistage Steam Turbines
Jing Yang,Juntao Xiong,Ivan McBean,Said Havakechian,Feng Liu,Jiaqi Luo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2514/1.b36022
2017-01-01
Journal of Propulsion and Power
Abstract:No AccessTechnical NotePerformance Impact of Manufacturing Variations for Multistage Steam TurbinesJing Yang, Juntao Xiong, Ivan McBean, Said Havakechian, Feng Liu and Jiaqi LuoJing YangPeking University, 100871 Beijing, China*Graduate Student, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics; .Search for more papers by this author, Juntao XiongUniversity of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697†Research Fellow, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering; .Search for more papers by this author, Ivan McBeanGE Power, 5401 Baden, Switzerland‡.Search for more papers by this author, Said HavakechianGE Power, 5401 Baden, Switzerland§.Search for more papers by this author, Feng LiuUniversity of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697¶Professor, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering; . Fellow AIAA.Search for more papers by this author and Jiaqi LuoPeking University, 100871 Beijing, China**Research Associate, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics; .Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:3 Mar 2017https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B36022SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Bammert K. and Sandstede H., “Influences of Manufacturing Tolerances and Surface Roughness of Blades on the Performance of Turbines,” Journal of Engineering for Power, Vol. 98, No. 1, 1976, pp. 29–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3446107 JEPOA8 0022-0825 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[2] Bunker R., “The Effects of Manufacturing Tolerances on Gas Turbine Cooling,” Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol. 131, No. 4, 2009, Paper 041018. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3072494 JOTUEI 0889-504X CrossrefGoogle Scholar[3] Goodhand M. N. and Miller R. J., “The Impact of Real Geometries on Three-Dimensional Separations in Compressors,” American Soc. of Mechanical Engineers Paper GT2010-22246, Fairfield, NJ, June 2010. CrossrefGoogle Scholar[4] Garzon V. E. and Darmofal D. L., “Impact of Geometric Variability on Axial Compressor Performace,” Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol. 125, No. 4, Oct. 2003, pp. 692–703. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1622715 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[5] Duffner J. D., “The Effects of Manufacturing Variability on Turbine Vane Performance,” M.S. Thesis, Massachusetts Inst. of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 2008. Google Scholar[6] Jameson A., “Aerodynamic Design via Control Theory,” Journal of Scientific Computing, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1988, pp. 233–260. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061285 JSCOEB 0885-7474 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[7] Giebmanns A., Backhaus J., Frey C. and Schnell R., “Compressor Leading Edge Sensitivities and Analysis with an Adjoint Flow Solver,” American Soc. of Mechanical Engineers Paper GT2013-94427, Fairfield, NJ, June 2013. CrossrefGoogle Scholar[8] Marta A. C. and Shankaran S., “Assessing Turbomachinery Performance Sensitivity to Boundary Conditions Using Control Theory,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 30, No. 5, 2014, pp. 1281–1294. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B35087 JPPOEL 0748-4658 LinkGoogle Scholar[9] Zamboni G., Banks G. and Bather S., “Gradient-Based Adjoint and Design of Experiment CFD Methodologies to Improve the Manufacturability of High Pressure Turbine Blades,” American Soc. of Mechanical Engineers Paper GT2016-56042, Fairfield, NJ, 2016. CrossrefGoogle Scholar[10] Luo J., Xiong J., Liu F. and Mcbean I., “Three-Dimensional Aerodynamic Design Optimization of a Turbine Blade by Using an Adjoint Method,” Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol. 133, No. 1, 2011, Paper 011026. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4001166 JOTUEI 0889-504X CrossrefGoogle Scholar[11] Luo J., Zhou C. and Liu F., “Multipoint Design Optimization of a Transonic Compressor Blade by Using an Adjoint Method,” Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol. 136, No. 5, 2014, Paper 051005. JOTUEI 0889-504X CrossrefGoogle Scholar[12] Luo J., Liu F. and Mcbean I., “Turbine Blade Row Optimization Through Endwall Contouring by an Adjoint Method,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 31, No. 2, 2015, pp. 505–518. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B35152 JPPOEL 0748-4658 LinkGoogle Scholar[13] Luo J. and Liu F., “Multi-Objective Design Optimization of a Transonic Compressor Rotor Using an Adjoint Equation Method,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 53, No. 3, 2015, pp. 797–801. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J053436 AIAJAH 0001-1452 LinkGoogle Scholar[14] Liu F. and Jameson A., “Multigrid Navier–Stokes Calculations for Three-Dimensional Cascades,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 31, No. 10, 1993, pp. 1785–1791. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/3.11850 AIAJAH 0001-1452 LinkGoogle Scholar[15] Liu F. and Zheng X., “A Strongly Coupled Time-Marching Method for Solving the Navier–Stokes and k−ω Turbulence Model Equations with Multigrid,” Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 128, No. 2, 1996, pp. 289–300. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1996.0211 JCTPAH 0021-9991 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[16] Zheng X. and Liu F., “Staggered Upwind Method for Solving Navier–Stokes and k−ω Turbulence Model Equations,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 33, No. 6, 1995, pp. 991–998. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12808 LinkGoogle Scholar[17] Menter F., “Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 32, No. 8, 1994, pp. 1598–1605. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149 AIAJAH 0001-1452 LinkGoogle Scholar[18] Roe P., “Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors and Difference Schemes,” Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 43, No. 2, 1981, pp. 357–372. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(81)90128-5 JCTPAH 0021-9991 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[19] Denton J., “The Calculation of Three-Dimensional Viscous Flow Through Multistage Turbomachines,” Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol. 114, No. 1, 1992, pp. 18–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2927983 JOTUEI 0889-504X CrossrefGoogle Scholar[20] Saxer A. P. and Giles M. B., “Predictions of Three-Dimensional Steady and Unsteady Inviscid Transonic Stator/Rotor Interaction with Inlet Radial Temperature Nonuniformity,” Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol. 116, No. 3, 1994, pp. 347–357. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2929421 JOTUEI 0889-504X CrossrefGoogle Scholar[21] Chima R. V., “Calculation of Multistage Turbomachinery Using Steady Characteristic Boundary Conditions,” NASA TM-1998-206613, 1998; also AIAA Paper 1998-0968, 1998. LinkGoogle Scholar[22] Wang D. and He L., “Adjoint Aerodynamic Design Optimization for Blades in Multi-Stage Turbomachines: Part I-Methodology and Verification,” Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol. 132, No. 2, 2010, Paper 021011. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3072498 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[23] Walther B. and Nadarajah S., “Constrained Adjoint-Based Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of a Single-Stage Transonic Compressor,” Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol. 135, No. 2, 2013, Paper 021017. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4007502 CrossrefGoogle Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byIntegrated passage design based on extended free-form deformation and adjoint optimizationChinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 34Stochastic aerodynamic analysis for compressor blades with manufacturing variability based on a mathematical dimensionality reduction method29 December 2021 | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, Vol. 236, No. 10Modeling of a turbine bladerow with stagger angle variation using the multi-fidelity influence superposition methodAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 121Robust design optimization considering inlet flow angle variations of a turbine cascadeAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 116Optimal Tolerance Allocation in Blade Manufacturing by Sensitivity-Based Performance Impact EvaluationJiaqi Luo, Yao Zheng and Feng Liu18 May 2020 | Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 36, No. 4Statistical evaluation of performance impact of manufacturing variability by an adjoint methodAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 77Design optimization of the last stage of a 4.5-stage compressor using a POD-based hybrid modelAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 76 What's Popular Volume 33, Number 4July 2017 CrossmarkInformationCopyright © 2016 by Jing Yang, Juntao Xiong, Ivan Mcbean, Said Havakechian, Feng Liu, and Jiaqi Luo. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the ISSN 0748-4658 (print) or 1533-3876 (online) to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsAerodynamic PerformanceAerodynamicsAeronautical EngineeringAeronauticsCFD CodesComputational Fluid DynamicsEquations of Fluid DynamicsFinite Difference MethodFinite Volume MethodFluid DynamicsMonte Carlo MethodNumerical Analysis KeywordsMultistage TurbineTotal Mass Flow RateReynolds Averaged Navier StokesProbability Density FunctionsAerodynamic PerformanceMonte Carlo SimulationTurbomachineryMultistage CompressorsFlow EquationsFinite Difference MethodAcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to GE Power and The National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 51376009 and 51676003) for funding this work and allowing its publication. The authors also thank the reviewers for their valuable comments, which have improved the quality of this Note.PDF Received24 September 2015Accepted31 October 2016Published online3 March 2017